Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. To what extent do you think is it a positive or negative development?
It is true that fossil fuel is humans’ primary power source, and the use of alternative energy sources is encouraged in several nations. Personally, I believe that this is a fundamentally welcome development.
One might argue that natural energy resources are unreliable, given that they depend almost entirely on weather and climate factors. For instance, solar panels and windmills are only functional when there are sunshine and strong winds, unlike fossil fuels, which will always work regardless of weather fluctuations. However, this line of reasoning is not sound, considering that scientists have recently developed power storage technologies and equipment that can store excess natural energy for later usage. It is also believed that they can be expensive and unaffordable for lower-income classes, but with the recent advancements of technology, the costs for wind turbines and solar grids have been plummeting. These resources are also capable of generating much larger amounts of energy compared to fossil fuels, rendering them more cost-effective.
Another great benefit of alternative sources of energy is that they can help alleviate current environmental problems. This is because traditional energy sources emit colossal amounts of carbon dioxide and other toxic pollutants during both production and usage, making them some of the main key drivers behind air pollution and climate change. Therefore, if the use of natural energy sources is widely promoted in place of fossil fuels, the current environmental crisis will be substantially mitigated. Renewable resources are also superior to fossil fuels due to the fact that they can be naturally replenished. To illustrate, solar energy will continue to be recharged by the sun for billions of years, while it is estimated that common fossil fuels like oil and coal will be fully depleted within a few decades. and they will likely be able to cater to the energy demands of thousands of generations to come.
In summary, it is my conviction that the promotion of the use of alternative energy sources is a positive phenomenon due to the tremendous benefits it brings about.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-18 | tttran12 | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-23 | Pau Nguyen | 89 | view |
| 2021-02-05 | hp_writing | 56 | view |
- In recent times economic growth has helped many become richer both in developed and developing countries However those in developed countries are not as happy as they were in the past Why is this What can be learned from this 89
- It is often claimed that electronic books will soon replace paper books Do you agree or disagree 78
- The bar chart shows expectation to change of European young people in the next 20 years in 5 different areas
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged To what extent do you think is it a positive or negative development 84
- More and more people today are buying and driving cars which has a positive impact on the economy but can hurt the environment Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... both production and usage, making them some of the main key drivers behind air pollution a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 817, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...be fully depleted within a few decades. and they will likely be able to cater to th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in summary, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41369047619 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91266580552 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574404761905 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5110237029 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.928571429 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29103366313 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106394620583 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909885095908 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205575148431 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704399281997 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.