Most agree that schools should be training children to recycle waste to preserve the Earth’s natural resources. However, some believe that it is parents who should teach their children to recycle waste while others feel schools are more responsible. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is a consensus among people that educational institutions should hold acccountable for teaching children how to recycle waste to maintain natural resources on earth. While some individuals opine that task is the responsibility of parents, others believe shools are more responsible. Personally, I think that both parents and schools should shoulder equally the responsibility of teaching children how to recycle.
On the one hand, many people do have points in arguing that parents should perform the task of teaching their offspring to recycle waste. First of all, parents are supposed to set a good example for their offsping since children can imitate the actions of their parents which derive from their observation. As a result, if parents recycle waste, their child will show their interest in this task and parents can start teaching their child how to recycle.Moreover, parents are the ones who always undetstand their child most, hence, this can be beneficial for them to know the way teaching their child effectively. To illustrate, stubborn children are often difficult to teach and refuse to do things that they do not interest in. Thus, it is parents that can teach their offspring and raise the interest in them.
On the other hand, I argue that educational institutions hold equally the accountability of teaching children how to recycle waste. The first reason is that children are often obey their teachers than their parents. Therefore, teachers can easily instruct them how to recycle waste, otherwise, teachers will become strict and children will be punished if they are stubborn. The second reason is that parents are often busy with their hectic schedule and have to handle a mountain of work in their office. As a consequence, it is the responsibility of schools to teach children how to recycle waste. To exemplify, schools can afford to invite environmentalists to have a speech and instruct children how to recycle waste to preserve our natural resources.
In conclusion, I argue that parents and educational institutions should shoulder equally the responsibility of teaching children how to recycle waste in order to maintain our natural resources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-23 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 67 | view |
- International tourism is the biggest industry in the world Unfortunately international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment 73
- Most agree that schools should be training children to recycle waste to preserve the Earth s natural resources However some believe that it is parents who should teach their children to recycle waste while others feel schools are more responsible Discuss 67
- Some businesses find that new employees who just finished their education lack basic interpersonal ability such as working with other employees as a team What do you think are the causes and what solutions can you suggest 84
- Many people have suggested that young adults should undertake a period of unpaid work helping people in their local community What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...art teaching their child how to recycle.Moreover, parents are the ones who always undets...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rder to maintain our natural resources.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, while, i think, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28366762178 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94326111988 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.426934097421 0.561755894193 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3339166635 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.933333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431244148771 0.244688304435 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167411784459 0.084324248473 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801156682165 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304528348694 0.151304729494 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792967457895 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...art teaching their child how to recycle.Moreover, parents are the ones who always undets...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rder to maintain our natural resources.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, while, i think, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28366762178 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94326111988 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.426934097421 0.561755894193 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3339166635 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.933333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431244148771 0.244688304435 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167411784459 0.084324248473 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801156682165 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304528348694 0.151304729494 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792967457895 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.