Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better to study alone Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group, while others believe that it is better to study alone. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In the competitive educational system, the optimal studying approach is prioritized by any pupil to accelerate their progress. Therefore, it is debatable whether teamwork or solitary learning can produce the best possible results. This essay will address both perspectives accompanied by my viewpoint on the matter.
On the one hand, collaborating with other fellow beings can present several justifiable advantages. To commence with, through the discussion about the predicaments encountered in studies, students can figure out the solution more efficaciously and rapidly. For instance, if a collection of learners gather to resolve different parts of a mathematical problem, each individual’s discovery can facilitate earlier finishing. Subsequently, they can also exchange their understandings to enhance their knowledge about the exercise, which reduces the duration and effort required. Another benefit is that through communication, students can excite the frequently monotonous experience of studying, thus generating more motivation to advance. This is particularly true for language learners who are struggling with speaking as they can remove the boredom and frustration when they have a partner to converse with in the foreign language. Moreover, the team creates an environment where students are constantly encouraged since they have to maintain their progression with other members.

On the other hand, several learners can benefit from improving academic performance by themselves. Firstly, if the collection is unorganized and distracted, it will render the study group time-consuming and useless. For example, teenagers today usually gather at the cafe to learn together but most often they immerse themselves in the casual confabulation without making any progress towards ambition. Secondly, as the pace of development between students is different, studying alone allows them to realize and accommodate their necessities. When a student is superior in one subject to others, it will be beneficial for him to focus on advanced knowledge instead of practicing the standard curriculum with others. Furthermore, not every learner’s character is suitable for cooperation, they may develop themselves through self-reflection or self-reliance and concentrate better when working on their own.
In conclusion, depending on the condition and personality of the students, they can vary flexibly between studying collectively or individually as both methods can have a positive influence on their studies.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-23 baobuicute123 89 view
2021-11-26 dokhanhchi22 81 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...panied by my viewpoint on the matter. On the one hand, collaborating with othe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their progression with other members. On the other hand, several learners can ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate better when working on their own. In conclusion, depending on the conditio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2164.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94505494505 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26452241984 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626373626374 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5239647355 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.294117647 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4117647059 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23529411765 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152483661132 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487974479426 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331647366038 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892081858123 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365640084248 0.056905535591 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.23 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 78.4519038076 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.