Governments should make people responsible for looking after their own local environment. Do you agree or disagree?
It is said that governments should make individuals hold accountability for the environment in their local area. Personally, I am in favor of this view.
To begin with, there are several environmental problems stemmed from dire consequences left by human's behaviours. It is true that a number of human activities have impacted directly or indirectly to plant and animal species to serve the purpose of humans. To exemplify, overpopulation and lucrative timber harvesting have driven people to deforest, which leaded to adversely concerning consequences such as animal's struggling to survive and plants cannot grow well. Therefore, administrations should make individuals bear responsibility for the environment in local area.
Moreover, there are several methods that can be employed by government to make people assume responsibility for the environment. First of all, government should foster awareness among citizens by having a speech or propaganda about environmental proplem. As a result, people can realize how much they have impacted their area and these actions proved efectively To illustrate, a survery conducted by Oxford University in 2017 pointed out that the number of people littered in the streets has declined from 75% to 50%. Furthermore, government can hold an acitivities about environment protection each month to make people have a chance to participate in. For instance, authorities can organize an activity of planting trees each week to foster youngster's awareness about the environment in their local area.
In conclusion, I agree that governments should make individuals shoulder the responsility of the environment due to dire consequences left by individuals to the environment. Also, there are a plethora of methods that can be used to make individuals be responsible for the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-23 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-10 | phiennn | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-07 | eyraen | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-31 | tinavuuuu | 73 | view |
- Most agree that schools should be training children to recycle waste to preserve the Earth s natural resources However some believe that it is parents who should teach their children to recycle waste while others feel schools are more responsible Discuss 67
- Some businesses find that new employees who just finished their education lack basic interpersonal ability such as working with other employees as a team What do you think are the causes and what solutions can you suggest 84
- Many people have suggested that young adults should undertake a period of unpaid work helping people in their local community What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 67
- At many companies today applicants are often rejected due to old age Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 78
- Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 744, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'youngsters'' or 'youngster's'?
Suggestion: youngsters'; youngster's
...y of planting trees each week to foster youngsters awareness about the environment in thei...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60288808664 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31840244066 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545126353791 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9558301254 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.384615385 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6153846154 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306674737741 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121991428864 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1073014424 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205681274381 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544843687199 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.