(17.01.2015) Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
These days, with the growth of populations in big cities, noise pollution is becoming a serious problem. While some people believe that government should ban some rules to reduce noise, I still believe that people can have all the right in the world to make sounds whatever and whenever they want.
On the one hand, there are various reasons why authorities should control noise, especially in residential areas. Firstly, noise is a small factor that contributes to bad health effects. When you expose to an area with too loud volume, your ears may have a problem such as severe tinnitus, and even a perforated eardrum. Also, a lot of people can not sleep a wink at night due to intrusive sounds from nearby industrial zones prevalent these days. Moreover, noise pollution distracts people concentrate on working or studying. As a result, they are not able to prepare well for tasks and be criticized by superiors. Therefore, pressure at work is also gradually becoming common in today's society.
On the other hand, several reasons explain why I believe that it would let citizens make the sound as much as they want. The first reason is that noise is a type of entertainment in our lives, especially in the advanced technology era. Many of them feel more comfortable and free when creating noise from different activities while working or entertaining. For instance, singing is a way to relieve stress and you can sing with many people to share your emotions. In addition, noise is becoming a part of our lives when manufacturing in industries and agricultural areas is popular. If the government is strict in this process, productivity can decrease and lead to a low standard of living.
To sum up, it seems to me that there should be some restrictions on producing noise despite the undeniable advantages of being freely
to make noise.
.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-16 | mbn250 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | Lee Daisy | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | Lee Daisy | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | harry@uppal | 84 | view |
- With increasing populations and even growing urabn centers many countries are losing their natural beauty spots What benefits are there to protecting places of natural beauty How can this be solved 78
- 29 5 2021 Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries shops and on public transport To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- The illustration shows information about how an igloo is built from snow Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows how to recycle organic waste to produce fertilizer compost 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 11, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o a low standard of living. To sum up, it seems to me that there should be some...
^^
Line 5, column 17, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ntages of being freely to make noise. .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92628205128 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75338199179 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602564102564 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6563011177 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.0625 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253222789423 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710689770292 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571748173948 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159031256405 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312424879838 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.