In the future, there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries. Is it a positive or negative development?
The increasing number of old population has become the norm in many nations around the world. There are many problems related to the phenomenon which will be discussed below.
The primary impact of an old population on society could be witnessed on many
aspects. First, it will exert a great pressure on the welfare and healthcare systems of countries. As people get older, their general health tend to degrade, old citizens then have to depend on the support from others which are often the healthcare employees. Likewise, when a large number of old people get sick, the need for hospitals, medicines, medical services is underscored. In addition, in nations where the number of the elderly is dominent, young people have to sacrifice a bigger proportion of their income to support their older counterparts. Some young individuals may not may not accept the reality and choose to migrate to other countries thus exacerbates the problem on those who remain.
Economic issue is of secondary concern for countries having old population structure. Given the fact that the old who have spent years contributing to their nations are not able to work in their old age, would result in the shortage of workers in certain fields especially labor intensive ones. For instance, Janpan with the majority of their people are old people recruit many employees from less developed nations in medical and manufacture sectors. Another challenge for the economy is to fund the facilities and services for older individuals, other priorities including finance for education, transportation would be cut off. Thus, the living standard of the whole population would be placed at risk.
In sum, when many people are in old age in a country, their community and general economy could be negatively impacted. I believe this phenomenon is a negative development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-28 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-03 | tieuquynh | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | Charles Le | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | DNTMdntm | 89 | view |
| 2022-04-22 | vanhyeet | 61 | view |
- Some people say that increasing fuel costs could reduce environmental problems do you agree or disagree 89
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 67
- If people could choose between a life without working or a life spending too much time working people would choose a life without work To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Many employees may work at home the modern technology Some people claim that it can benefit only workers not employers Do you agree or disagree ex 67
- Some people think that the best way to become successful in life is to get a university education whereas others say this is no longer true Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on on society could be witnessed on many aspects. First, it will exert a great pr...
^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...he healthcare employees. Likewise, when a large number of old people get sick, the need for hospi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 579, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'may not'.
Suggestion: may not
...er counterparts. Some young individuals may not may not accept the reality and choose to migrat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, likewise, may, second, so, then, thus, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16722408027 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76510768625 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558528428094 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5254484038 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250136865787 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837250140908 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573035152857 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140922346776 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407608975421 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.