The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the process delineating how to generate electricity in a hydroelectric power plant.
It is perceptible that this is a two-stage diagram in two distinct times of a day with multiple steps, which commences with reserving water in the dam and ends with the transmission of electricity to households.
The diurnal stage initiates when water from the river which is stopped the circulation of movement by a dam is kept in a high-level reservoir. Following that, currents of water run across the intake and move downhill along the conduit to the energy conversion center. In the subsequent step, the function of reversible turbines in the power station operates the generator, thenceforth constitutes electrical power. The final stage is when new-created electricity accords to power lines to be transported to the national grid, simultaneously, water goes straightly to the low-level tank.
When it comes to the nocturnal stage, water stored in the low-level reservoir is reverted to the station, followed by the support of turbines to pump it back into the high-level reservoir which is closed during the night. Ultimately, the water interchanges with a persistent cycle inside the duct.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-31 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | Aung | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | Hồ Phi Long | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The line graph shows the percentage of people accessing news from 4 sources 73
- The charts below show the proportion of people s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 78
- The picture shows the process of making wool Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows a typical American and a Japanese office Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29473684211 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11096710743 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573684210526 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6151982409 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.375 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118728817845 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629678245826 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809784723161 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973899002971 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874495929389 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.