In recent years, tourists have paid attention to preserving both the culture and environment of the places they visit. However, some people think that it is impossible to be a responsible tourist. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.
Tourism has become increasingly widespread in the last decades. While some travelers are attempting safeguarding the local heritage and the ecosystem where they visit, others believe that it would be unable to do so. I somewhat disagree with the viewpoint as tourists have many options to assist the protection of local tradition and nature, even though sometimes it may be difficult for them.
It is understandable why some overlook the contribution of tourists' protection of local legacy. This is because travelers, who are deemed as outsiders, are lack of mechanism and instruments to aid the process. However, contrary to popular belief, tousrits can contribute to the local protection of cutural heritage and tourist attractions by varied methods. They may take part in social campaigns to collect trashes at local tourists' hotspots, or spend a modest amount of money to sponsor for the renovation of ancient architecture, and so forth.
Another explanation for my support of travelers' assistance to maintain cutural tradition and local ecosystem is that if tourist neglect their impacts on the tourism sites, it may exert a great burden on their travel destinations. It is common that some reckless tourists demonstrate little regard to the local norm, relegious belief, and sanitation to where they visit, which leads to accidental humiliation and even destruction of local properties.
However, some people may argue that the effort of travelers may not be able to make a difference. This stems from the fact that visitors, in general, do not have resources to prevent the local culture and habitat from the effects of either natural deterioration or human's factor. However, this thinking is flawed, as tourists' can consitute to the preservation indirectly through their spending on admission fees, necessities.
In sum, I somewhat object to the idea that it is impossible to be accountable travelers. There are many choices for tourists to foster the preservation of the local culture and nature, if this is ignored, local tourism industry may be at risk, albeit shortage of relevant materials.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-29 | Charles Le | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-29 | Pau Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2017-04-27 | kingnight153 | 49 | view |
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language could still be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many employees may work at home the modern technology Some people claim that it can benefit only workers not employers Do you agree or disagree 67
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems What are those problems In order to reduce this problem should we discourage people to use cars 89
- Some people say that increasing fuel costs could reduce environmental problems do you agree or disagree 89
- When talking about success we often think of people who are rich or famous In your opinion what are the qualities that characterise a successful person Why do you think these should be the criteria 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as outsiders, are lack of mechanism and instruments to aid the process. However,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, so, while, as to, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34730538922 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95596787275 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547904191617 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6422404895 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.571428571 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223248082636 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788010807833 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398529900501 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134393010675 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334680381003 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.