Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam.
how true do you think this statement is?
what measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars?
Over the last couple of decades, the possession of vehicles has risen drastically, thus posing multiple regions around the globe into “one big traffic jam” and I agree with this statement. The following paragraphs will elaborate on my opinion and the operations which can be performed to resolve such an issue.
The increasing rates of car possession have undoubtedly led to a majour complication which is traffic overflow. In my opinion, the mentioned statement is accurate due to several reasons. First, technological development has offered the population affordable cars which are generated by electricity instead of expensive gasoline, hence its popularity. For instance, the Tesla designed by Elon Musk has become a worldwide attraction and trend of the season, for the reason that it is activated by electricity and it is easily charged. Secondly, banks are offering loans to people who are incapable of disclosing a full car payment. To illustrate, minimum wage employees consider the purchase of a vehicle unfeasible, but due to the availability of financial support, families are now proud possessors of the latest cars, costing approximately twenty to thirty thousand dollars paid on the verge of two to five years. Finally, the overgrowth of the population is leading to greater demands in the automobile field. As a result, car sale rates are multiplying daily, and their appearance on the street is leading to obstacles on the road due to their accumulation.
Endless procedures can be interpreted to find a solution for the over-cramming of cities’ roads. The government should promote the usage of public methods of transport such as trams, trains, and buses. This can be achieved by providing the inhabitants of a city with the accessibility, safety, affordability, and comfort of such systems. For instance, Dubai has initiated an underground train system that employees, students, and even businessmen find reasonable to use daily.
In conclusion, the presence of advanced and affordable cars has caused an exponential traffic problem which many areas of the world are encountering nowadays. Strategic measures have been taken by the government to impose improvements onto public transport systems, consequently many will favour using them instead of their car.
- Water pollution has become an increasing problem over the past few decades What causes water pollution How can we prevent this problem 78
- Many people continue to use cars and motorcycles even though they know that they are bad for the environment Why is this What can be done to reduce the use of these vehicles 78
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should be responsible for solving this problem To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many governments have laws that ban the sale and use of hard drugs such as heroin and cocaine yet they allow people to buy drugs such as tobacco and alcohol Laws that prohibit the sale and use of hard drugs should be applied to all drugs including tobacco 89
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, hence, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42577030812 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11026051458 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610644257703 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5914559173 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0625 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236261732064 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628789260887 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046098067127 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129831757465 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344752225531 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.