Nowadays, experience is more valued in the workplace than knowledge in many countries.
Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
There is no debate about crucial role of practical techniques which are used on a job position and often considered as more vital than having theoretical knowledge. Although, this approach is beneficial to some areas but not to all of them.
To start with, technical sectors do require some fixed period of experience as we cannot understand mechanical working only by reading books. But, this is not to be mistaken that a person with only experience is more efficient than knowledgeable worker. Theoretical study aid us in having basic assumption about a particular topic we are learning. Take for an example, if a person who is working in a motor shop does not know about that very engine he is de-assembling how will he is going to make it right, whether he had some experience or not. This ends up in, However we may be great at something by doing it over and over again, but without a basic know-how we are just useless.
On the other hand, is it only knowledge that makes most of a perfect post ? The answer maybe a solid no. Even though, having an elementary knowledge of most of the sections, can result in a good experience also. Though, In this world, anybody is not best at anything right from his or her birth rather they are made like this, throughout their academic life. In few industries such as legal, managerial and healthcare, having important knowledge is most essential. For instance, medical practitioners gain information through a long period, then they are able to practice healthcare, not by just apprenticeship under other doctor. Even if, we acquire some practical aspect there will be still facts need to be remember.
In a conclusion, it is still a hot potato that workers who are more experienced than knowledgeable, are to be valued more. But as both of these are two sides of a same coin, one can not be sacrifice for the sake of other or it could be fully unjust to over power experience for factual information about an occupation due to equal importance of both in a job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-16 | rishabhk4896@gmail.com | 87 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | rishabhk4896@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | rishabhk4896@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | Cielo | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | vidung | 93 | view |
- Today many people use the internet and smartphones to transfer money to their friends relatives and businesses Is this a positive or negative development 89
- The table and charts gives information about a police budget of an area in Britain 79
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspaper or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying Do you agree or disagree 84
- Nowadays experience is more valued in the workplace than knowledge in many countries Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 87
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both views and give your own opinion 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 207, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ctions, can result in a good experience also. Though, In this world, anybody is not ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, then, for instance, such as, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73937677054 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78464168401 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589235127479 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5917316067 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5625 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0625 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155996643746 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531585964178 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556121778286 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920423218968 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180832482902 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.