In some cities and towns all over the world, the high volume of traffic is a problem.
What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem?
Today, severe traffic is one of the primary concerns in many urban locations across the globe. I am convinced that the root causes/the main culprits of this are related to overcrowding and poor public transport systems, which can be solved through proper laws and policies.
Heavy traffic/The situation is attributed to several fundamental reasons. One convincing reason would be the overpopulation of metropolitan areas when more people tend to settle in urban areas for better employment opportunities and study. The more city dwellers there are, the higher the number of traffic participants, causing considerable rush-hour traffic. Another reason should be the increased utilization of personal vehicles when other means of transport such as buses or subway trains are rather inconvenient and unreliable. In Vietnam, for instance, pickpocketing, declining conditions, and far bus stops have discouraged many passengers from using public vehicles. As a result, private cars or motorbikes become their first choice since these vehicles may allow users greater flexibility in arranging their work.
Several appropriate/necessary measures can be taken to address/eliminate this problem. First of all, anti-urbanization strategies should be employed/implemented. More factories and schools need to be built/introduced in rural and suburban areas to eliminate the movement of people to cities. Secondly, increasing the dependability of public transportation might be one way to encourage individuals to abandon their cars in favor of the bus or train. Concessionary pricing should also be implemented to promote the use of public transportation.
In conclusion, population growth and inadequate public transportation are the two culprits of thick traffic. Therefore, policies to encourage the use of public transit and support counter-urbanization can be effective solutions for this problem.
274 words.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-19 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | ililmaidatuz | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-28 | linh allie | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-28 | linh allie | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-25 | linh allie | 56 | view |
- With the advancement in technology the number of computers being used in the field of education has increased Some people believe that there will be no role of teachers in the classroom To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The pictures below show how tea is produced They also illustrate the process of making a cup of tea 91
- With the advancement in technology the number of computers being used in the field of education has increased Some people believe that there will be no role of teachers in the classroom To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In recent years there has been an increase in bad behavior poor discipline and antisocial behavior in schools Tough measures and stricter punishments by schools parents and others are necessary to stop this trend What are the advantages and disadvantages 84
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as for, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92057761733 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.65192389172 2.80592935109 130% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631768953069 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3109667838 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193850811214 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621402326759 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719646564334 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128223863165 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355281030555 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as for, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92057761733 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.65192389172 2.80592935109 130% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631768953069 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3109667838 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193850811214 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621402326759 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719646564334 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128223863165 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355281030555 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.