The best curriculum is not one that is based on a static body of knowledge but one which teaches students to cope with change
As the world progress more and more, people began pondering about how to improve upon the pre-existing aspects of life, especially around the topic of education. One idea suggests that rather than upkeeping the unvarying tradition, a curriculum where learners are provided with knowledge on how they can handle the ever changing world would be more suitable. As someone who is experiencing said system, I can comfortably say that this argument is one be agreed to disagree on, to which this essay will elucidate further
To decide whichever study method is better require one to understand thoroughly each of their attributes to accurately give an unbiased take. First, let us consider the former way of intaking knowledge: through a solid, unchanging body of information. At its core, this method not only serves as a consistent and reliable reserve of learning material, it is also very much unfailible. Granted, this is only true if the student is able to comprehend fully what is has to offer, but that is more than enough to be proven valuable. Most subjects taught are also needed for many occupations today, especially those that are part of STEM, concurrently being a future society is working towards. Yet, some do precisely point of the flaw that in its strength, stating dissent against the rigidity of it all. Said criticism is true in my opinion, seeing as the traditional system leaves little to no wiggle room for students to truly depict the real world.
On the other end, positive appraisals have been bestowed upon the new proposed way to study: via pratical-based teaching. Advocators proclaim its efficiency in assisting youngster to better fare with the all of the shifting happening conspicuously around them. Moreover, one could make an argument that the idea fits more with today’s vision of development, though as mentioned above, it would be unfair to deny traditional learning’s accordance with said pathway. Nevertheless, I find myself agreeing quite keenly with the pros of the method. However, it must as well be known that even the most flexible curriculum bears the need for a set formula to guarantee cohesiveness and consistency.
In conclusion, I am still on the fence about the betterness of one over the other way to study, as defining them both exactly is a tall task, but one can clearly discern their potencies and shortcomings. As such, it truly does come down to personal preference to decide between the two, at last until further efficiency experiments have been carried out.
- The best curriculum is not one that is based on a static body of knowledge but one which teaches students to cope with change 89
- The best curriculum is not one that is based on a static body of knowledge but one which teaches students to cope with change 89
- Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society 84
- Virtual life on social media has become a parallel one with equal importance to the life in reality What causes the phenomenon and is this a positive change Write an essay of about 350 words to support your opinion and support your answer with relevant ex 84
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...sting youngster to better fare with the all of the shifting happening conspicuously around...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, well, as to, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2112.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 417.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06474820144 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83102640993 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 176.041082164 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630695443645 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.582698376 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0625 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186109787684 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471287473217 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517755915418 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104206818786 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347627222536 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.