Task 2: In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend?
It is true that nowadays, urban dwellers tend to live on their own or in a nuclear family. As far as I am concerned, although this tendency can lead to some negative consequences, living in small households still possesses some notable benefits.
On the one hand, the trend of living in smaller families can be attributed to the significant increment in the accommodation price. Moreover, the migration of people from rural to urban areas has resulted in the ever-growing demand for more available estates. Therefore, housing stocks in many cities tend to be inadequate to meet the need of migrated individuals. Moreover, property developers have taken the advantage of this population shift to raise house prices, in which they tend to construct more apartment blocks that just provide adequate areas for small families. If they do not wish to endure squalid housing conditions, it is crucial for people to live alone or with smaller groups.
On the other hand, it is undeniable that some drawbacks can be observed when the tendency of forming nuclear families becomes ubiquitous. Firstly, with the mass exodus of people from the countryside to city centers, ties of the kinship of typically extended families in the rural areas can be broken. As a result, family gathering takes place rarely, and several household expenses can no longer be shared between many family members living under the same roof. For instance, grandparents used to play a crucial role in supporting parents with house prices, child-minding, or cooking. Secondly, living alone can also promote a sense of alienation among individuals. Without parental financial and mental support, they tend to suffer from several social and health problems, which attenuate their motivation to pursue their study and career.
In conclusion, I believe that the tendency of living in nuclear households can bring both positive and negative consequences for the individual in both financial and social aspects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-05 | hi.nguyn91 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | nhidao2102 | 89 | view |
| 2022-06-10 | trachanhkhongmat | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-03 | dinhthu05 | 89 | view |
| 2021-06-15 | Lâm Yên Chi | 73 | view |
- Task 2 Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What are the major causes of environmental damage Who are responsible for preventing environmental damage 78
- Task 1 The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010
- Task 2 Crimes committed by young people are increasing in major cities throughout the world Discuss the causes and how to solve this problem 80
- Task 1 The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010
- Fewer young people do farming work in rural areas Why Should young people be encouraged to do farming work 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually put before the verb 'place'.
Suggestion: rarely place
...en. As a result, family gathering takes place rarely, and several household expenses can no ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l in both financial and social aspects.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, as for, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26349206349 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82232756423 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568253968254 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8990526741 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.428571429 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8571428571 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20180860506 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683108332217 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435690354004 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115690357806 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283422863485 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.