In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong while other consider it as valuable work experience important foe learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion on this?
Several nations encourage juveniles to do activities by giving them a renumeration. A half of the individuals agree that this is a wrong behavior and other support the view thinking that it is very helpful for minors to gain some knowledge. In my opinion, it is bad because employment in such a small age can impact their health as well as they become habitual to work which in turn hinder their study.
Health is something that we consider now as our wealth. If we become healthy since our childhood, we will be able to do almost all type of activities related to both somatic and brainy. For example, study in sub-Saharan Africa shows that the infants of the age 5 to 17 years who work from their early ages miss their diet and nutrients which lead them to suffer from malnutrition and provides a route to their stunted growth, weakened immune systems, and cognitive delays. This problem will hinder them more in future. Therefore, I believe working from early years whether it is rewarded or unrewarded is misdeed.
Managing study time while doing job is tedious for most of the public. In support, parents of kids who are in privation encourage them more to work rather than schooling which impede academic performance of their son and daughters. For illustrations, In Somalia, the adult literacy rate is only 40% as the guardians of stripling encourage them to chore for money. The youngsters there have very low scholastic grasp. This is another reason that I don’t acknowledge the statement above.
In conclusion, the act of giving freedom for children to do work with reimbursement is not good as it can impact their health at very small age and also reduce their academic performance
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-16 | Guiseppe59192 | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-27 | rupinderrai | 61 | view |
| 2022-09-27 | rupinderrai | 61 | view |
- When a country develops its technology the traditional skills and ways of life die out It is pointless to try and keep them alive To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think is a positive or negative development 73
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 73
- In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work Some people regard this as completely wrong while other consider it as valuable work experience important foe learning and taking responsibility What is your opinion on this 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 508, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ays. This problem will hinder them more in future. Therefore, I believe working from earl...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84192439863 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67351743381 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594501718213 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4812898033 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.642857143 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116748535372 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411060748842 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375696991033 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0744182602343 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301895296954 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 508, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ays. This problem will hinder them more in future. Therefore, I believe working from earl...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84192439863 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67351743381 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594501718213 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4812898033 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.642857143 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116748535372 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411060748842 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375696991033 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0744182602343 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301895296954 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.