Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long
hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
People often possess different opinions on the type of working hours. Although some people prefer working three days a week for long hours, I prefer working five days a week for shorter hours. Hence, I disagree with the statement.
First of all, I enjoy having free time, and working five days a week for shorter hours can give me more free time. For example, when I was a research assistant at Academia Sinica, I worked five days a week and I had almost 7 hours a day as my free time from Monday to Friday. Moreover, I can use this free time to read my favorite novel or watch Netflix, and even play table tennis with my friends. Therefore, I can fully enjoy my free time after off duty. However, if I worked three days a week for a long time, I might lose three days of my free time at least. Apparently, working for long hours can not bring about more free time for me.
Secondly, I place emphasis on separating the pressure evenly, and working for a shorter time can allow me to do the separation. For example, when I was an engineer at Micron, I felt less pressure since I only needed to work 6 hours a day. To be more specific, I didn’t need to finish all the missions in a short time but distribute my loading in five days. As a result, I succeeded in separating the pressure evenly and felt not stressful every day. Yet, my friend, Andy, who worked at TSMC, usually asked for working 12 hours or above a day even though he only worked three days a week. Obviously, he was always overwhelmed by the tremendous workload and could not feel relaxed.
Last but not least, I care about living a more regular life, and working five days a week for a shorter time can allow me to have this lifestyle. For example, due to working 5 days a week for 7 hours in ASML, I always get up at seven o’clock to work and sleep at eleven o’clock after leaving my company. Consequently, I live a regular life and gets a healthy body. Nevertheless, my friend, Baskar works in TSMC and the company asked every labor to work for 12 hours a day. Even though he only needs to work three days, he lives an unregular life and destroyed his health gradually. Apparently, this kind of work might make people live irregularly.
In conclusion, I prefer working five days a week for shorter hours. After all, this type of job can help me enjoy my free time, separate my pressure evenly and live a regular life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- The ability to adapt or adjust to the changing condition is more important than excellent knowledge in a job Do you agree or disagree with this statement 70
- A D Teachers in the past have more influence on students than they do today 68
- It is important to have rules about the kind of clothing people should wear to go to work and school Do you agree or disagree with this statement 71
- Genetic modification a process used to change an organism s genes and hence its characteristics is now being used to improve trees Through genetic modification it is possible to create trees that produce more fruit grow faster or withstand adverse conditi 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, after all, at least, for example, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.39686098655 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41618848188 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.439461883408 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 614.7 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 9.59856630824 219% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6642425447 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2608695652 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3913043478 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.60869565217 5.45110844103 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390715361138 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143065205961 0.076458572812 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107740602442 0.0737576698707 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262779187976 0.150856017488 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372438540022 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.24 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.81 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, after all, at least, for example, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.39686098655 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41618848188 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.439461883408 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 614.7 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 9.59856630824 219% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6642425447 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2608695652 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3913043478 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.60869565217 5.45110844103 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390715361138 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143065205961 0.076458572812 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107740602442 0.0737576698707 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262779187976 0.150856017488 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372438540022 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.24 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.81 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.