In many countries, people like to eat more food from other regions than can be grown in a local area. As a result, much of the food has to come from other regions. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?
It is a recent issue that the growth of foreign foods continuously rises in many nations since people prefer consuming those meals to their native ones. This issue, personally, I believe would bring about considerable demerits for several reason which will be elucidated more below.
Perhaps, in my standpoint, excessive food consumption originated from out of countries significantly erode authentic cuisines. In connection with the massive influence of social media, many young parents who have commonly exposed to foreign trend might serve daily meals with modern menu on the table. Thus, the existence of origin ones would be left behind due to its unpopularities among children. Moreover, the layers of imported food packaging generate a great amount of waste production. To retain its freshness and nutrients, high food grade plastics are required for the distributed process, yet non-biodegradable wrapping remains as contributing-pollutant factors.
On the other hand, foreign meal consumption which have uncommon raw materials from the origin country greatly contributes the numerous food variants. Seemingly, high quality products and nutritious contents displayed in supermarkets become the most preference of vast majority of society. As a result, this not only improves creative-cooked dishes but also will maintain greater healthy body. In addition, the imported trade of such food ingredients may be a lucrative businesses which gradually will improve state revenue. Instead of wasting food at harvesting season, this will encourage farmer communities to produce those food sources and sell with a reasonable price resulting in higher welfare and prosperity both farmers and country.
In conclusion, while the tendecy of consuming foreign foods would bring beneficial to some extent. I would contradict that the drawbacks are more significance in terms of the crisis of traditional and cultural cuisines and the higher non-biodegradable food waste.
- The use of social media is replacing face to face contact with many people Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20 in the last ten years Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend 89
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female study in every subject Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians Others believe that artists should be funded by alternative sources Discuss both views and give your own 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'several reasons'.
Suggestion: several reasons
...d bring about considerable demerits for several reason which will be elucidated more below. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'business'?
Suggestion: business
...uch food ingredients may be a lucrative businesses which gradually will improve state reve...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7337883959 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15382369844 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679180887372 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7942201393 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211843798999 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659455853486 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400084993336 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119056863575 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031135155091 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.