People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world？
Nowadays, more and more people have little awareness of natural world’s importance. This essay will discuss some reasons why human is lacked of environment knowledge and how they can learn about this.
First of all, in modern life people are attracted by social network and lots of theme news, which make them missing most of environment news. It is thought that entertainment news always more interesting than global warming news. Beside that, many school system in all over the world are focus on computational and logical subject such as Math, English, Physics, so some of subjects learning about nature are decreased. A great deal of facilities offers people a major advanced in technologization which give a hand in their busy life. This is different from the past when citizen had to dependence on nature to earn money.
To solve this problem, government bear a burden of responsibility for raising people’ awareness. World communications network is one of the best ways to provide information to human, especially young generation. For example, real environment new should be continously update to approach social network users, outcoming consequences to warn human at the same time. On top of that, increasing knowledge about environment in education system from primary school to high school and even university. Organizing many campaigns social work in order to attract people concern about environmental issues.
In conclusion, the main reason of shortage of knowledge about natural world comes from lack of human awareness. So goverment and politicians is one of important element lead to solution orientation.
- The table below shows the number of motor vehicles per 1 000 inhabitants in eight countries in 1990 and 2000
- The graph below shows the proportion of types of magazines sold by the company in 1975 1995 and 2015
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 56
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002
- The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3984375 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96183404962 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65625 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6780154723 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.7142857143 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379125173843 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114339997336 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107705077772 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24461421095 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13589556806 0.056905535591 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.