Convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and methods of preparation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, as the food industry has bloomed, convenience foods have become an indispensable part of one's diet, threatening traditional cuisine. However, from my perspective, traditional foods and methods can not be outshadowed by convenience ones.
On one hand, junk food has become an optimal choice for a section of the public. To be more specific, since many people are immersed in their work, they have no time to cook for themselves and their family. As a result, they opt for convenience foods because they demand little time and effort.
On the other hand, traditional foods are superior to fast foods. Firstly, conventional foods are more nutritious than junk foods. It is reported that many convenience dietary products use chemical substances to lengthen their expiry dates. Meanwhile, cooking at home entitles people to choose high-quality raw ingredients, adjust the amount of salt, sugar, etc that not only suits their taste but also benefits their health. Secondly, traditional foods reflect one’s cultural values, which makes them incomparable. It’s every nuance of those foods that has been embedded in every one’s mind, reminding them of their blissful childhood, families, memories, and so on. For example, people who have been away from home for a long time, hometown cuisine is their aspiration. Although it is not difficult to find those foods in their residence, the feelings, tastes, cooking methods, etc cannot fulfill their nostalgia. Last but not least, more and more traditional eateries are being opened to preserve the taste of long-established values. As a matter of fact, a horde of Tik Tok creators, food reviewers, etc have a tendency to choose the restaurants and vendors that incorporate traditional cooking methods, assisting traditional dishes to access more and more people, especially youngsters.
For these reasons, I believe that despite the increasing prevalence of convenience foods, traditional foods still play an irreplaceable role in human’s life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-21 | Nguyen051207 | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-24 | leanguyen | 89 | view |
| 2021-06-30 | phoaiphuthinh | 61 | view |
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 61
- More people are stressed today than ever before What are the causes of this stress What can be done to address this problem 73
- Men and women are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples Write at least 250 words 73
- The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live think and behave However some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life To what extent do you agree or disagree w 60
- More people are stressed today than ever before What are the causes of this stress What can be done to address this problem 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ds have become an indispensable part of ones diet, threatening traditional cuisine. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, for example, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40634920635 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91372543634 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596825396825 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6535347587 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.4375 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229368735066 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895842620565 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686393859038 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174439912293 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666205321447 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.