The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters traveling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030.
The line graph gives information about the number of British people commuting to work by three particular means of transportation in their daily life from 1970 to 2023.
In general, it can be seen that cars and trains have an upward trend, while fewer people travel to work by bus during the period.
At the beginning of the period, 5,5 million people commuted to work by car, and two million fewer people used the bus than cars. UK residents traveling to work by train in 1975 made up 2,5 million after gradually increasing to 3 million in 2010. Bus experienced a slight drop, at over 3 million commuters. The figure for using cars rose and later significantly increased to 7 million in 2010.
Commuting by train is expected to outlook the number of people using buses, which is forecasted to drop gradually to reach its lowest point at slightly less than 3 million commuters. Over the period of prediction, the number of people using cars to work will rise to a peak of 9 million in 2030.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-10 | chipchip99 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | chau hoang | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | chau hoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | xuongrongnho | view | |
| 2023-07-26 | xuongrongnho | 10 | view |
- The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 78
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the silkworm 78
- 24 04 2014 An increasing number of advertisement on TV aim at children What are the effects of television advertisement SHould televison advertisements be controlled 78
- Advertising discourages people from being different individuals by making us want to be and to look the same To what extnet do you agree or disagree 78
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown bel 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62711864407 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56779505634 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576271186441 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4165738677 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.375 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20105908951 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942139195992 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325022735255 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128522183054 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00588348518804 0.0819641961636 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.