The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
The real talent of an artist can be accurately assessed even when he is alive. Even when he still contributes more compositions. He can identify his talents from his or her current works. Maybe he will progress in future. So that can also assess from his or her work. But I don't think it is accurate to assess his talent at the beginning of his career. Every person will not show their skill at the beginning of their career. It will take time to study the field and practising more in the field will enhance their skills. But it is not necessary to wait till several generations after his death.
Consider a music composer who contributes several compositions and the audience has a positive response to him. There are so many people who love his compositions and it does not interfere with his fame. Because they are just music lovers. Nowadays there are so many musicians who became popular through the internet. This is only because of their talent and not because of their background or fame. People tried to focus on real talent and they accept musicians' real talent without considering their fame or background.
But on the contrary to this point, I have to add one more thing. There are still nepotism exists in these industries. For example, a Bollywood actor who committed suicide because of clinical depression was an actor with real talent. But none of the co-actor and other crew members acknowledged him during his career. The jury also did not consider his work for awards. The award-winning candidate was a much lesser talented person than him. He didn't get acknowledgement from any of the senior celebrities also. All these things lead to a conspiracy among the audience. They are not satisfied with all these unequal treatments. His death was due to some personal reason, but the co-actors and other celebrities started talking about his talent after his death. But this leads to a talk about nepotism among the audience. They strongly stood for that actor's real talent. So I think the audience is capable of assessing real talent when he is currently working in his career. This is just an example of another industry. But every industry is also similar to it.
In conclusion, It is not necessary to wait till several generations after death for assessing the real talent of a popular musician. Nowadays the audience is capable of assessing the compositions without being interfered with by his background and his fame. But some of the cases are interfered with by their fame in the industries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-03 | Gbangbala Usman | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Gnyana | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | Jbrachael | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Ataraxia-m | 62 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Ataraxia-m | 50 | view |
- The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked both its economy and national identity are endangered Bec 50
- The first step to self knowledge is rejection of the familiar Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your po 16
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment 50
- Some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society especially among children Others believe that children s peer groups and parental role models are a much more powerful influence on children s beh 50
- In order to alleviate the serious unemployment problem in our town we should encourage Autotech to build its automobile manufacturing plant in our area The Hillview landfill which has been undeveloped for decades is a perfect site for this plant The build 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even when” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...urately assessed even when he is alive. Even when he still contributes more compositions....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...r current works. Maybe he will progress in future. So that can also assess from his or he...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...also assess from his or her work. But I dont think it is accurate to assess his tale...
^^^^
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nd it does not interfere with his fame. Because they are just music lovers. Nowadays th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...uch lesser talented person than him. He didnt get acknowledgement from any of the sen...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ment from any of the senior celebrities also. All these things lead to a conspiracy ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1060, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t every industry is also similar to it. In conclusion, It is not necessary to wa...
^^^
Line 4, column 263, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ith by his background and his fame. But some of the cases are interfered with by their fame...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, for example, i think, in conclusion, talking about, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2087.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 432.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83101851852 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63602732275 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446759259259 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 659.7 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.2370786517 163% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8995640635 60.3974514979 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 63.2424242424 118.986275619 53% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.0909090909 23.4991977007 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.9696969697 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357457977078 0.243740707755 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858741176949 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923562569591 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247843039807 0.150359130593 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875136975565 0.0667264976115 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 14.1392134831 56% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 12.1743820225 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.85 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.8971910112 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.