Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cellphone tracking and security cameras).In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening.
Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
The development of technology brings convenience to people’s life. However, the increase in the use of technology to monitor others for any purpose has cast doubt on its benefits of it. The question is in what case the use of technology to track people is legal.
Nowadays, in many major cities, security cameras are recording the movements of ordinary citizens. The use of security cameras can help the policies easy to find criminals, and in some cases then a camera may provide useful evidence. Additionally, whenever a cellphone is used, the call is logged, so the service provider knows exactly when and where the user made the call. This can help the rescue teams locate the person in an accident if they have a cell phone with them.
On the other hand, personal information is very important in the informational age. By taking advantage of the vulnerability in the security of some monitor technologies, the thieves can get the user information and use it for illegal purposes. For example, the thieves can use the information about the bank account to steal money or use someone else’s identity to scam others. Furthermore, in countries where human rights are ignored, the use of security cameras or listening devices may be harmful to society.
In conclusion, it seems inevitable that there will be more and more ways to monitor society in the future. It is obvious that the advantages of this are more than the disadvantages. However, our responsibility is to evaluate new technology and decide whether it will do more harm than good.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-02 | cinderel | 61 | view |
| 2022-12-19 | phuongnguyen1234 | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-16 | Ieltsbg | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-20 | nguyenne | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-27 | Fatehaulakh09 | 78 | view |
- Southland s main exports in 2000 2015 and future projection of 2025
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 73
- While many people go to university for academic study more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers Agree or disagree 61
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, for example, in conclusion, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95019157088 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85781636908 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582375478927 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2547505689 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.2857142857 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319936594843 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977710568907 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665036284135 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167977416683 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645990499284 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, for example, in conclusion, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95019157088 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85781636908 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582375478927 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2547505689 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.2857142857 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319936594843 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977710568907 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665036284135 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167977416683 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645990499284 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.