As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road system. Some people think that the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that the users should pay for the cost.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
An increasing number of automobiles on the streets mean more resources are used for the improvement of road infrastructure. Opinions are divided as to whether such responsibility should lie with the government or road users. Personally, I think both sides should bear the costs of the construction as well as upkeep of road system.
The advocates of a government-funded road network base their belief on the fact that only the authorities have the financial clout to implement such enormous work. In fact, the majority of vehicle owners do not have enough resources to cover the expenses beyond their household ones as most of them have a low or medium income. Were they forced to take full responsibility for a nationwide road system, they would likely evade such duty. This means a large proportion of the road system would fall into disrepair, thus crippling the local economy. And eventually the government has to shoulder the costs of repairs so as to revive the economy.
The opponents of the aforementioned idea argue that motorists should be made accountable for the upgrade and maintained of road infrastructure. This is because they are the main users of the system and therefore, the biggest beneficiaries. As a result, they should bear the costs of the road improvements through increased taxes or fees. Although this might impose a heavier tax burden on vehicle owners, such approach can not only ensure that roads and bridges can be well maintained but also enable the government to invest in other key areas.
However, a hybrid solution would be the best. Governments should pay for the construction and maintained of state roads since these tasks incur substantial expenditures that not many can afford, while individuals should contribute to such costs through taxes and tolls. This proposal can ensure a balance between governmental and individual responsibilities, leading to the sustainable development of society.
In conclusion, it is important to recognize roads as a public good that requires equal attention from both the government and individuals to keep it in good condition.
- some people believe that damage to the environment is an inevitable consequence of the improvement of living standards Do you agree or disagree 11
- People living in the 21st century have a better quality of life than the previous centuries To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- As The Number Of Cars Increases More Money Has To Be Spent On Road System Some People Think That The Government Should Pay For This Others However Think That The Users Should Pay For The Cost Discuss Both Views And Give Your Opinion 61
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road system Some people think that the government should pay for this Others however think that the users should pay for the cost Discuss both views and give your opinion 70
- In many countries people now wear western clothes such as suits and jeans rather than traditional clothing Why is this the case Is this a positive or negative development 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ad infrastructure. Opinions are divided as to whether such responsibility should lie with the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ould bear the costs of the construction as well as upkeep of road system. The advocates...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 616, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...nt has to shoulder the costs of repairs so as to revive the economy. The opponents of t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, i think, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22352941176 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09810747008 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555882352941 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4022803468 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319693441231 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984177313904 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644737542085 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172326018198 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892401766809 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ad infrastructure. Opinions are divided as to whether such responsibility should lie with the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ould bear the costs of the construction as well as upkeep of road system. The advocates...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 616, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...nt has to shoulder the costs of repairs so as to revive the economy. The opponents of t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, i think, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22352941176 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09810747008 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555882352941 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4022803468 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319693441231 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984177313904 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644737542085 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172326018198 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892401766809 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.