Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Developed countries usually aid poorer nations financially, however poverty is still not solved. I fully believe that wealthy countries should help differently instead of just giving weaker countries money.
Developing countries do not have as great management as developed nations, so the money they were provided will not be used effectively. In pooerer countries, highly experienced and skillful professionals are much rarer, while corrupted authorities are more common than powerful nations. Therefore, the finacial aid from powerful countries is not utilized effetively. To solve this problem, they should send professionals of many fields over to weaker countries to help; with this strategy, the improvement of those nations will be more guaranteed. For instance, Russians engineers were send to Viet Nam to built the Hoa Binh dam and electricity systems for it, the project succeeded.
Instead of giving away pure money to help, developed countries should establish jobs and trading ability so weaker nations can improve by themselves. Many developing countries do not have sustainable income to improve by themselves, so they have to rely on the money wealthy countries provided. Therefore they should create jobs opportunities in developing countries, so they can make money by themselves. Moreover many weaker countries' security and political status are heavily alarming, so wealthy nations should help them in these two aspects. Some countries' military power are lackluster and some countries' polictical status are also in peril. Therefore they are easy tagets for neighbor countries. Developed countries should provide military and political support to ensure that weaker coutries can be safe.
In conclusion, for a poorer countries to improve, financial aid is not the best method powerful nations can help. They should send professionals to poorer countries, establish jobs opportunities and military as well as political supports.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Thai Tran | 87 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
- Some countries achieve international sports by building specialised facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Do you think this is positive or negative development Discuss both views and give your opinio 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa
- The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 78
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...fferently instead of just giving weaker countries money. Developing countries do not h...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sent'.
Suggestion: sent
.... For instance, Russians engineers were send to Viet Nam to built the Hoa Binh dam a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...n the money wealthy countries provided. Therefore they should create jobs opportunities i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 407, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
..., so they can make money by themselves. Moreover many weaker countries security and poli...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 428, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...ney by themselves. Moreover many weaker countries security and political status are heavi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 649, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...es polictical status are also in peril. Therefore they are easy tagets for neighbor count...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71232876712 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91533112423 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52397260274 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8056202754 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.25 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379400168567 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146761229632 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914883234456 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270332024654 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959053545007 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.