Some people think that zoos are cruel and all the zoos should be closed. However,other people think that zoos are useful to protect the rare animals. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Talking about the function of zoos is always debatable. It is often argued that zoos are supposed to be closed because animals receive very violent handling by the zookeepers. However, several people agree that zoos should remain in existence due to their crucial responsibilities to protect endangered animals. I partially agree that zoo presence is crucial which I will elaborate below.
To begin with, zoos seem very horrible where animals get brutal treatment both mentally and physically by the zookeeper. Regarding animal physical abuse, zookeepers tend to push the animal physically in terms of attractions which generates the animals nasty fatigue. Furthermore, the zookeepers tend to ignore the animal necessity such as enough meals and suitable accommodation. For instance, Elephants at Ragunan Zoo seem to suffer mentally in captivity since the lack of both spaces and food supplies. As a result, animals are suffering ironically that can lead to their death. Therefore, the zoos should be closed if their management is not being improved where many cruel cases to animals appear rampantly which can impact animals to be aggressive and unpredictable.
Shifting towards the second view, it is commonly argued that the existence of zoos is still essential due to the animal preservation purpose by establishing home for them. This is regarding the fact that a myriad of endangered species lose their habitat. For instance, in small regions of Borneo Island, there are forest fires which cause the loss of Orangutan environment which means that nature is no longer providing the proper accommodation for living. In addition, zoos are built to protect the species from the illegal hunter, especially for those rare animals. Therefore, the zoos carry serious responsibilities for the forthcoming animal offspring not only continuously maintaining but also preserving.
To conclude, the urgency of zoos function is still needed due to animal preservation and it is better to maintain the existence of zoos. This is as long as the people are taking care of species necessity seriously for the forthcoming era.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-03 | ratunugraheni | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | ratunugraheni | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | ratunugraheni | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | ratunugraheni | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | ratunugraheni | 67 | view |
- The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one The new fashion mil be to have several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that continues throughout life 73
- Environmental problems are too big for individual countries and individual people to address We have reached the stage where the only way to protect the environment is to address it at an international level To what extent do you agree or disagree with th 84
- Some people think that job satisfaction is more important than job security Others think that people cannot expect to enjoy a job and having a permanent job is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and all the zoos should be closed However other people think that zoos are useful to protect the rare animals Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, regarding, second, so, still, therefore, for instance, in addition, such as, talking about, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38138138138 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91246397581 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546546546547 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.845448358 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.411764706 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5882352941 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11764705882 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290483867987 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950172942817 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060021875597 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178810598579 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595025455782 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.