Some countries spend a lot of money preparing competitors to take part in major competitions such as an Olympic Games or football World Cup. Some people say that it would be better to spend this money encouraging children to take up sports from a young age. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, some nations largely fund professional athletes to join in great competitions, but some people opine that such fund is better off endowing a new talent involved in sports since school age. I, personally, state the same perspective of this issue for the reasonable points, which will be deliberated below.
On the one side, being the parts of great world tournaments expends big national budget which is supposed to engage educational institution in identifying and shaping children’s skills in sports. Beginning at the Loyola High School pool, Michael Phelps started his intense training at Aquatic Club, eventually holds the most Olympic medals since 15-year old. Furthermore, the number of remarkable youth can inspire upcoming national generation to dive in sports competition. To strengthen their confidence in men’s group activities might empower woman to be more participated. Therefore, many will be a nation’s valuable asset embarking on world sports championships.
On the flip side, financial support offered by countries to professional athletes aims to achieve global reputation of sporting events. To illustrate, Captain Lionel Messi, earning approximately 30 trophies and playing over 1,000 games, lifts Argentina to win FIFA World Cup 2022 after 36 years of waiting. In addition, successful athletes enable to continue the further steps by spreading their wings in wider social network. Gradually, many of them would notch up great achievements, such as Dwayne Johnson where the smackdown player reaches his notable career as an actor or a film director.
In conclusion, in my standpoint, some nations intensify their bigger funds to the world tournaments’ athletes due to elevating the national involvement of global events and individuals’ greater career. This is as long as youth keeps promoting women empowerment on the world competitions.
- Some people believe people cannot solve environmental problems whereas others believe individuals are responsible for solving environmental problems Discuss both views and give your own 70
- More and more people want to own items such as cars clothing and other things that are made by famous brands Do you think it is a positive or negative development 80
- Some young people like to copy the behaviour and clothes of famous people today Why might this be the case What problems can it cause 84
- Tourism has been a good source of revenue in many countries and government should promote the industry Do you agree or disagree 61
- Despite a large number of gyms a sedentary lifestyle is gaining popularity in the contemporary world What problems are associated with this What solutions can you suggest 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...untries to professional athletes aims to achieve global reputation of sporting ev...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62456140351 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03968620305 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.701754385965 0.561755894193 125% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3895235113 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.307692308 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165882056509 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503606171611 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035959615827 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095673319253 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307137619145 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.