Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school. What are the reasons? What could be done to solve this problem?
In recent years, lack of student concentration at school has never failed to draw public attention and spark controversies. In this essay, the reasons behind this phenomenon will be discussed, along with appropriate solutions to it.
There are two elements that contribute to limited concentration of children. The first one is that children are repeatedly surrounded by massive available distractions of noise such as the sound of TV, or voices of people talking. In particular, most parents have disrespected their children’s learning environments. When their children are studying in a room, they are unconsciously annoying their children by turning on TV, or surfing social media with noise in verbal discussions. Studies have shown that children are naturally curious, that is why they can’t ignore these available distractions and have self-control to current activities. This leads to the fact that lack of children practicing concentration will cause attention difficulty in children.
Furthermore, another reason that should be taken into account is shortage of encouragement and recognition provided by teachers at school. This is exemplified by feelings of being neglected when children are studying in classes. This is because of crowded classes, teachers find it difficult to precisely observe and give compliments, or encouragement to their students. As a result, children will find it disregarded and lose their interest in lessons.
Two solutions of great practicality are suggested to alleviate the situation. To begin with, parents should have awareness of their children’s mental development. To be more specific, parents should create an effective studying environment without making noises. By doing this, children will have more opportunities to practice their concentration and improve their focus on lessons at school. Teachers’ observation in classes can also be conducted as a way to combat the problem. In particular, teachers should have a better observation in classes in order to notice students who need encouragement or attention to engage in lessons. The attention from teachers provides children recognition and being noticed so that it can help them make more effort into studying.
In conclusion, being repeatedly surrounded by massive available distractions of noise and shortage of encouragement and recognition in classes are the main reasons that account for the problem. Along with solutions mentioned above, there are a number of ways that could be done to counteract this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-04 | hien3112 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | ngo viet | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Nguyen Hai Dang | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | ngango56 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Anne020304 | 89 | view |
- Studies have suggested that children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creativ 73
- The bar chart shows the information of the number of volunteers and paid workers in 4 different roles in the sports sector of an Australian town in 2015 67
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 84
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 84
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2161.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64229765013 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18198252386 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506527415144 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 642.6 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.714459 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.904761905 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2380952381 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95238095238 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210086238135 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682343688938 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576708915103 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147643031548 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655712311378 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2161.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64229765013 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18198252386 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506527415144 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 642.6 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.714459 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.904761905 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2380952381 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95238095238 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210086238135 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682343688938 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576708915103 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147643031548 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655712311378 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.