Many young people today change their jobs or careers every few years. More advantages than disadvantages?
It is true that in this modern era, youngsters tend to switch their jobs after a few years of working. Even though this tendency might provide them with diverse working environments, I believe that it could also lessen their opportunities for future jobs and their relationships at work might not be durable, which is negative overall.
To begin with, changing working places constantly could bring young people different types of experience. They therefore could develop a wide range of skills, which could be helpful when applying for jobs that have many requirements. Data analysts that used to work as programmers, for instance, could utilize their knowledge about numbers and technology to support their work. Furthermore, after experienced several types of occupation, they might find the one that suits them best and pursue it in long-term.
However, the ones who switch jobs frequently might not be valued by employers and they would find it hard to build a strong connection with people at workplaces. Employers of large enterprises usually value employees who commit to work for them in long term. They therefore would avoid hiring those who have a history of changing jobs after a few years, which shows no dedication to the previous jobs and tend to happen to their companies. Furthermore, corporations often spend a lot of time and money on employing the suitable person for each of their positions, especially high position such as CEO. Therefore, if youngsters keep switching their jobs so frequently, they will lose their opportunities in large companies. Moreover, the relationships between those people and their colleagues would be breakable as they spend little time to know each other. No valuable connections, as a result, would make young people become lonely and have even less chances to develop themselves.
In conclusion, while constantly changing careers could be advantageous to young people, I argue that its disadvantages prevail over its benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | hieuasroma@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | Vivi_peach | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | Zeroplague0407 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | Ediyorbek521 | 61 | view |
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 67
- Many young people today change their jobs or careers every few years More advantages than disadvantages 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 67
- Crimes committed by young people are increasing in major cities throughout the world Discuss the causes and how to solve this problem 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 949, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...oung people become lonely and have even less chances to develop themselves. In conc...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28164556962 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86303224103 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566455696203 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3078053831 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.214285714 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234259162476 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816075762016 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539382543597 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145431080538 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239767534275 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.