As well as making money, businesses should also have social responsibilities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, some claim that businesses should also have social obligations. While I acknowledge that a major concentration of companies is to generate profits to better survive in a competitive world, I still hold the thought that corporations also should make social contributions within their sphere of influence.
On the one hand, it is rational that the primary objective of companies is to be more and more lucrative as this is not only a fundamental element of the existence of any business but also beneficial for society. First and foremost, having a financial abundance would support companies to avoid experiencing running out of capital, which can lead to some potential collapse such as bankruptcy and taking on risky debts. Indeed, for any business organization, money is indispensable to cover operation costs, such as employees’ wages and facility payments. In addition, in order to surpass competitors and hold a larger market share, it is required to have a huge amount of budget to implement long-term strategies such as product innovations and marketing campaigns. Secondly, it is undeniable that once a company’s development grows stably, it opens more career opportunities for people which reduces the unemployment rate. As a result, quality of life would be improved and the crime rate in society that has escalated in recent years would be alleviated.
Nevertheless, despite the aforementioned reasons, I would contend that because of the benefit for both society and the sustainable growth of businesses themselves, social duty should become one of the top priorities of any business. **Firstly**, those corporations that make a profit base on natural resources, for example, mineral or fuel manufacturers, aside from exploiting the natural environment, are highly responsible for maintaining the ecosystem balance. Overexploitation without any measure to restore the original environment and process industrial waste definitely impacts negatively the Earth and human life. And of course, it prevents such companies from a sustainable development goal. **Secondly,** if companies are enthusiastic about community projects, and corporate well with the government to establish charitable funds or environmental protection programs, this enhances business brand awareness effectively. As a result, they get very high credibility from people leading to an increase in sales. Moreover, such firms would be received government assistance for small and medium-sized enterprises, especially in the period that they are encountering various challenges and obstacles in the economic crisis.
By the way of conclusion, the costs involved in running a business indeed depend on profitability, so this thinking should be seen as a top priority. However, I am a proponent of making a dedication to citizens' benefits would strengthen the business existence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | linh allie | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | linh allie | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | HaleyLin2000 | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | HaleyLin2000 | 56 | view |
- Directors of large companies often receive much bigger salary increases than ordinary workers Employers organizations say that in the global market this is necessary to attract the best management talent What are your views 73
- What are some of the reasons firms engage in FDI 11
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work What could be the reasons for this Do you think it is a positive or a negative development 61
- Some people think that children perform better in a single sex school compared to a mixed school To what extent do you agree or disagree 74
- The peformance of staf can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 712, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , *
...sustainable development goal. **Secondly,** if companies are enthusiastic about co...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, of course, such as, as a result, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2445.0 1615.20841683 151% => OK
No of words: 433.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64665127021 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3079527349 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 176.041082164 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598152424942 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 783.0 506.74238477 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.8949211873 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.823529412 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4705882353 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171861690716 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550146748261 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672200432455 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121522159527 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662267612056 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 78.4519038076 192% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.