Advertising is becoming more and more common in everyday life.
Is this a positive or negative development?
In temporary times, a multitude of brands have chosen advertising as their preferred method to engage with customers and promote their products. This essay critically examines this approach and argues that the positive outcomes of such a trend outweigh the potential drawbacks.
First and foremost, advertising offers numerous merits, one of which is its ability to easily attract the attention of consumers, thereby enhancing brand recognition. Almost everyone has their own smart devices and uses social media so they seems to have many opportunities to approach advertising. Take Coca-cola for example, the company promotes its products on various renowned social networking platforms through formats such as short videos or posters. As a result, Coca-Cola has gained increased global recognition and a wider consumer base.
Furthermore, this trend also contributes to revenue growth for brands. While there is an initial cost associated with advertising, the subsequent boost in sales can lead to overall increased revenue. Take the case of M.A.C, an exceptional cosmetics brand, which showcases stunning visuals not only of their lipsticks but also their latest products like eye palettes. This strategic approach prompts potential buyers to make purchasing decisions, propelling the brand towards revenue peaks upon each new product launch.
In conclusion, while potential disadvantages of advertising, such as consumer annoyance, may exist, the evidence overwhelmingly suggests that the benefits far outweigh any drawbacks. It is therefore advisable for governments to establish policies that prevent the abuse of advertising for fraudulent purposes and ensure a conducive advertising environment. This approach will strike a balance between brand promotion and consumer protection.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | vuhongminh | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | nguyennhathuy | 56 | view |
- The maps below show changes in the city of Nelson in recent times 61
- The restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure It would be more beneficial to spend this money on building new houses and roads Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK from 1974 to 2002 by four different modes of transport 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to advertise'.
Suggestion: to advertise
...imes, a multitude of brands have chosen advertising as their preferred method to engage wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 241, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'seem'
Suggestion: seem
...t devices and uses social media so they seems to have many opportunities to approach ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: C
...increased revenue. Take the case of M.A.C, an exceptional cosmetics brand, which ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87739463602 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97361947221 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670498084291 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4508912124 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0802754930928 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0295211113686 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344424699559 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0551301381186 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343772836228 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.