It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
With the significant development of technology, traditional culture is gradually disappearing. I agree with this view and believe technology and traditional cultures can not coexist.
On the one hand, there may be occasions when technology can enhance traditional culture. Firstly, modern equipment can make traditional activities more efficient and yield better results. For example, in Mexico, indigenous communities use eco-friendly technologies to produce honey while preserving their cultural customs. Similarly, film-making offers an excellent opportunity for people to explore cultures from all over the globe while remaining entertaining.
On the other hand, the rapid advancement of technology continues to erode traditional ways of life worldwide. With access to smartphones and computers becoming more prevalent among young people in rural areas, some team sports or unique cultural practices lose attention as younger generations prefer digital activities instead of building on their traditions. Every day, we find it easy to see that most children, even though aged five, can use smartphones or computers to play games or chat with their friends, so they rarely spend time exploring their culture. Furthermore, fewer people nowadays are interested in traditional skills such as pottery-making because modern machines can perform those tasks quickly.
In conclusion, while there may be occasions when technology and traditional culture can work together for mutual benefit discovering each other; however, its steady process signifies a significant loss for many societies' cultures globally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-07 | dorae | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | dorae | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-26 | thuyan1211 | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-09 | tranvuongphuongmy | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | Emma1998 | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph gives information about the drinking habits of the US population by age Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts below show the comparison of time spent in minutes per day by UK s Males and Females on household and leisure activities in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below give information on the location and types of dance classes young people in a town in Australia are currently attending Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interested in certain sports 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, similarly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 231.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.96103896104 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06779527559 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.701298701299 0.561755894193 125% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2240774615 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.181818182 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1818181818 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310374878799 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140433619699 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121321593245 0.0667982634062 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237144617973 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140469999992 0.056905535591 247% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.