The diagram below shows how a simple water filter is constructed and how it functions to produce clean drinking water.
The given picture illustrates how to make a straightforward water filter and the process by which purified drinking water is produced for the use of the citizens.
Overall, the process employs uncomplicated equipment as well as the natural properties of three different materials to remove contaminants from water.
Regarding the diagram, the key components necessary for this method are a considerable container and three natural elements named sand, charcoal, and gravel. Those components have their own functions in order to get refining water and are arranged in layers, with the deepest one being gravel and on top of which is clean sand, and then another layer of crushed charcoal.
During the filtering process, raw water is poured into the container first after undergoing various layers. Passing the layer of clean sand, small particles are trapped, followed by pollutants being absorbed by the charcoal and tiny debris being trapped by the gravel, respectively. After that, the water is filtered and ready for drinking. Subsequently, a pipe that is affixed to the container is used to transfer water to another separate container, where it remains available for people to use for living and irrigation wherever they require it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-22 | too3ig | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-16 | Paralmani | 100 | view |
| 2021-09-25 | Haphuong204 | 79 | view |
| 2021-09-24 | TranMinhDuc | 76 | view |
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010
- The chart below shows the number of students from four different countries applying to European universities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- It is often thought that the increase in juvenile crime can be attributed to violence in the media Do you think it is the reason for the growth in the rate of juvenile crime What solutions can you offer to deal with this situation 84
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink housing clothing and entertainme Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people think it is more important to plant more trees in open areas in towns and cities than provide more housing To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, so, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33163265306 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8277413969 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632653061224 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9503323763 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.625 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250124071722 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109724652091 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935904614762 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156793690225 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103617037552 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.