The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality, both actual and target (what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve), and the number of complaints and passengers.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Two bar charts are presented with data about the performance of bus company over 5 years (1999-2003). The first bar chart is used to show shortcoming of the bus service on terms of punctuality, and the second is used to show the number of complains by the passenger.
The bus service company were only able to surpass their target in year 2003. Year 2000 was the worst year as the difference between the target and actual service was highest. In other years the difference between actual and target was not more than 2%.
There was a gradual increase in number of complains made by the passenger, with only exception in year 2001, which had fewer complains compared to previous year. Maximum complain happen in year 2003 (120) and minimum in year 1999 (70). Approx number of complain made by the passenger is coming to be 95.
The most ironic thing is that even though the bus company is able to surpass its target in year 2003, it remain the year with maximum complain.
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 58
- men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks 50
- Unfortunately in contemporary society creating an appealing image has more important than the reality or truth behind that image 58
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing During the past year Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on the job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant where the work shifts are one hour shorter than our 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'remains'?
Suggestion: remains
... to surpass its target in year 2003, it remain the year with maximum complain.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63005780347 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34411416001 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543352601156 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2959468886 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203586744847 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100768796373 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392186683828 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131150418001 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521969404936 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.