The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided diagram elucidates the significant change of a public library floor, comparing the current venue and the 20-year previous one.
Overall, it is clear that each previous section has been categorized and renovated, additionally, some facilities were added in terms of each room’s function.
According to the latter map, the previous tables and chairs in the center of the library floor are removed and replaced by a bigger section called cafe which takes the place of the old enquiry desk. Additionally, any service is now automated by machines.
There are some remarkable renovations. While the children’s area was in the top right corner of the library 20 years ago, it was moved to the left side and added more facilities, such as sofas and a stage for storytelling events. Furthermore, the location of the previous children’s books changes to be the lecture room. Instead of the former reading room, it has been reconstructed to the computer room. And the corridor between the children and computer section now is the area of all reference books.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-05-14 | 123456abcxyz | 11 | view |
2024-05-14 | 123456abcxyz | 11 | view |
2024-05-11 | Tường Vân | 11 | view |
2024-03-25 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
2024-03-25 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
- Reading for pleasure can develop imagination and language skills better than watching TV To what extent you agree or disagree 78
- the chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 78
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 84
- More and more people are becoming overweight Some people suggest that increasing the price of fattening food is a solution to what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12571428571 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84140810163 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617142857143 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.5135615701 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125590130652 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460004301458 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604773902855 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818456686 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709661562603 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.