Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some people believe that the major environmental issue is more crucial to be concerned, others feel that the wildlife and plant species on the verge of extinction these days is a real threat to sustainable Earth. There are arguments on both sides which we will discuss here.
On the one side, objectors of addressing natural extinction as overriding factor of ecological problem argue that the rapid population growth of a region induces overwhelming electricity consumption. A heated issue emerges on Jakarta-Indonesia, coal-fired power plant emitting great smog, releasing PM2.5 which sickens citizens from respiratory and pulmonary diseases. Furthermore, regarding plastic waste in oceans, discharging treated waste water from nuclear plants would threat sea life and ecosystem. The Fukushima nuclear reactors in Japan flows its waste containing (tritium and carbon-14) in the Pacific Ocean, consequently, exported seafood drastically declines due to consumer’s anxiety about water contamination.
On the flip side, together with marine habitat loss (fishing cats and shrimps), large-scale mangrove deforestation could globally endanger the potential of oxygen production higher than urban forests. The more mangroves are used for industrial purposes, the more carbon-capturing ecosystem will not sequester CO2 release on Earth. In addition, more and more marine biodiversity is being threatened due to the growing number of Great Pacific Garbage Patch. A scientific evidence showed that cetaceans, particularly whales, mostly ingest plastic bags and fishing nets resulting in their deaths, which disrupt phytoplankton growth qualifying more productive ocean.
In conclusion, in my standpoint, the balance ecosystem of flora and fauna regarding ecological issues is more feasible action considering the need of storing carbon emission and the key role of more productive natural life. This is as long as the big amount of waste, particularly nuclear, is strictly controlled to retain its standard.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-13 | Mayuresh0809 | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
- Plastic bags plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment What damage does plastic do to the environment What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem 90
- In some cultures children are encouraged to compete against each other What are the advantages and disadvantages of this approach 84
- In many countries people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could Why do you think this is What can be done to change this 89
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has a negative effect on young people s reading and writing skills Do you agree or disagree 89
- As computers translate quickly and accurately learning foreign languages is a waste of time To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, regarding, so, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85324232082 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09611435877 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672354948805 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6426116244 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.916666667 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141850107609 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467491092582 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488188788758 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902477653763 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708124878862 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.95 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.08 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.