The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but the general well-being of all its people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Yes, I agree with the given statement that the country is not defined by the achievments of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but overall the people who live in it. It is always the people who define the country's stature for 'Happiness Index', and all other indices. People of the country states the standard of living.
We can know more about this with the example of Netherlands. Netherlands being a small country with a population of nearly 15 million to 35 million has very high standard of living, and is ranked number 1 in 'Human Development Index' although, with significantly small population than other developed countries it has very high quality of life. The people took care of the country as it is their own home, they won't litter waste on roads, parks or in any public places, the air quality index is also controlled because of good enviroment maintained by everyone. Even though Netherlands does not have any achievement which might be signifcant to other nations it has claimed the health, well-being, their own people as number one priority. Netherlands doesn't count the greatness achieved by its rulers or artists but general public. If general public has achieved all of its goals then Netherlands has achieved all of its goals.
In contrast we can see that Somalia, and Syria are not on same page as of Netherlands. They tend have to believe that the country is great nation if they can prove that the their leader is only greatest. They make a belief that accolades by artists are not worthy of exalt but anything done by the their leader no matter how insignificant and worst it is, shall be worthy of praise by everyone else. Studies by Oxford University claim that the nations run by rulers (dictators) 95% end up in ruins, or bankrupt. Public of that nation always end up revolting against the ruler and asking any other foreign nation to interfere making people lose their own motherland.
It is always the general public of a country who is garlanded by praises and accolades. Ruler is just a representative of the nation who is choosen by the people, for the people. Although artists, scientists have great significance to make country prosperous, erudite but if people are not willing to accept them it makes impossible for the country to go forth in the future. All scientists and artist might leave the nation and may not come back again.
A nation is whole if and only if its people are treated in proper respect because it is them who define the status of the country if it is good or bad in terms like behavior, Happiness Index, Development Index and all other parameters which are used by UNICEF, UN. The better the people are the better the countries standard of living, Human development Index, Happiness Index, and helping index is.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-28 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-05 | MakeMeGreater | 80 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Jeyodi123 | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-08 | Gnyana | 66 | view |
| 2022-04-25 | Indrayani Yadav | 66 | view |
- Claim Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts Reason Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public 66
- The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but the general well being of all its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing an 66
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your posi 58
- Claim Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Reason We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both Write a response in which you discuss the extent to w 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 750, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ple as number one priority. Netherlands doesnt count the greatness achieved by its rul...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 815, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...s achieved by its rulers or artists but general public. If general public has achieved all of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 831, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s rulers or artists but general public. If general public has achieved all of its ...
^^
Line 3, column 834, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ulers or artists but general public. If general public has achieved all of its goals then Neth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...ds has achieved all of its goals. In contrast we can see that Somalia, and Syria are ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
... is great nation if they can prove that the their leader is only greatest. They make a be...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...ot worthy of exalt but anything done by the their leader no matter how insignificant and ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 18, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...eir own motherland. It is always the general public of a country who is garlanded by praise...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, well, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2300.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 480.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79166666667 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59645859243 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464583333333 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 711.0 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4589792038 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.35 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262928998616 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859621145509 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704317745605 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145543465786 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535045852171 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.