Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
In today’s fast-paced digital age, the question of whether a society can regard any living man or woman as a hero is a matter of great debate. Society is changing every time, and the new generation sees the new hero from different kinds of perspectives and has common ideas about the person. I partially agree with the statement that it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero because the reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished. A hero is supernatural for his specific kind of work, but not all of her work; the media scrutinizes a personal character's personal life and makes the hero subject to a media trail that hampers the hero’s reputation completely.
First of all, with the advancement of digital media, there is a loss of newspapers, channels, or agencies run by the corporate house, and they have a specific goal to follow. Now all the news agencies are working for the interests of groups of people, a society, or a country, and they use the media as a medium for oppression. Many people do great work for society, but they are ignored by the media or overstretched by the media, so their good works are destroyed in a short period of time. Nowadays, many media outlets are trying to represent many social media entertainers as heroes because, in today’s world, all things are counted based on social media like, shares, and views. The media represent them as heroes for more audiences to watch their news or content on social media or the internet, but they are not heroes at all. They do simple TikTok videos or YouTube videos to entertain people.
In our society, many people try to do a good job for society, and they are the main heroes of our lives. Many people are defamed in the media for political issues, but he has no political connection. Many social media sites don’t show the hero in the media because it will generate money from the news. Any political leader is not a hero today because of social media because it represents the leader negatively or positively and hampers the reputation of the leader. Some media represent the person positively, and some media represent them negatively, and finally, he is no longer a hero.
The government should use strict rules for these issues, but sometimes the government uses them against the hero for political reasons, because there is no freedom of speech in many countries in the world, like North Korea. There is only one hero, the supreme leader of the country, but there must be more heroes.
Media helps to represent the hero sometimes. Any national player playing for the country is celebrated as a hero. The media plays a key role in making this player a hero. The supreme person of the country is represented as a hero and celebrated as a hero. Although the media hurts regarding a man or woman as a hero, it also presents someone as a hero depending on their interest. But we know all about heroes from social media, so it has a great contribution to making a man a hero because media can reach an ample amount of people in a short time.
In conclusion, the media plays a double standard to make a man or woman a hero depending on their interest, so it is not possible to read a living man or woman as a hero. But the media is not all the bed; they also help to make a man a hero if it will not harm the corporate house that runs the media.
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree o 58
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
In today’s fast-paced digital age, the question of whether a society can regard any living man or ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 629, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'character'?
Suggestion: character
... work; the media scrutinizes a personal characters personal life and makes the hero subjec...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 478, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...eir good works are destroyed in a short period of time. Nowadays, many media outlets are tryin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, regarding, so, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2814.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 617.0 442.535393258 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56077795786 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98392262146 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55244937396 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.398703403566 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 924.3 704.065955056 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 17.0 1.77640449438 957% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4160130699 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.56 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.68 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 10.2758426966 214% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277174880294 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101668599528 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0973584862918 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174646719228 0.150359130593 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0936793279732 0.0667264976115 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.