Around the world, many adults are working from home, and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
With the affordability and easy accessibility of modern technology, human's lifestyles have witnessed a striking change from conventional to more modernized. On a global scale, workers are currently leading a work-from-home lifestyle while more students started getting access to online teaching. From my perspective, this is undoubtedly a beneficial development despite some minor drawbacks.
Granted, social communication can be restricted in light of little interaction with others. People started to lead an online lifestyle which allows them to pursue their work and education from a strikingly far distance. This has become a reluctance for both young and older generations to have face-to-face communication with their beloved ones, especially those not living in their contact area. However, people should acknowledge how technology has been enhanced to satisfy the ever-increasing demand for communication. There have been a great number of online platforms established assisting people in staying in touch with their friends and co-workers from other places. For example, Meta Platforms launched a project called Messengers that creates a video-conferencing and wireless-connecting application allowing users to text and phone their acquaintances with the help of internet connections.
Another advantage of this phenomenon is that more and more people can spend time on other activities. Since technology helps reduce the downtime and inefficacy of commuting, people can spare some time for their personally favorable activities. They, for instance, spend more time gardening and drawing, according to the latest research of Harvard University. Not only is it the case for the two abovementioned activities, but an elevated number of families also schedule more activities to bond their relationship. Moreover, another benefit is the reduction in institutional fees, which has become a merit for students of all levels of education. Courses from the Internet provide platforms with much lower prices because of the reduction in costs for additional aspects, such as hiring a wide range of professionals. This can be evidenced that more schools have been establishing pre-recorded videos of teachers teaching and publishing on their designated platforms. Therefore, a considerable amount of money spent on staff recruitment gradually lowered after the shift to online learning methods.
In conclusion, although there are some minimal downsides of cyber lifestyle, there are various benefits related to this phenomenon, ranging from the increasing time for personally favorite activities to the broader accessibility of education due to reduced fees of learning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | Nguyen144202 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | oanh2020 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | maidiem.1508 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | thanhbinh | 61 | view |
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and how they are supported by their employers 78
- An increasing number of people are choosing to have cosmetic surgery in order to improve their appearance Why is this the case Is it a positive or negative development 84
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 84
- The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport 24 hours per day and seven days a week To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people believe world poverty can be solved by the governments of rich countries giving large amounts of money to the governments of poor countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2292.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84693877551 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.310182692 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59693877551 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8109011746 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.333333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190535142313 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062335080522 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054512327551 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129451237699 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787696198038 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 78.4519038076 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2292.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84693877551 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.310182692 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59693877551 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8109011746 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.333333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190535142313 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062335080522 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054512327551 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129451237699 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787696198038 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 78.4519038076 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.