Governments should ban dangerous sports. Others think that people should have the freedom to do any sport activity.Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Nowadays, parallel to the development of outdoor activities, the number of people tends to participate not only in common sports, but also highly likely to take part in adventurous ones. Some people recommend that government should enforce the laws in order to reduce the amount of citizens who are willing to try on new sports. On the other hand, others encourage to create more opportunities for athletes in any levels to play the discouraged ones. This essay will discuss both point of views.
For the first recommendation, it is clearly to identify the reason why adventurous pastime are discouraged, they are known to be extremely cautious for the amateurs, who lack of experience to join in. This is due to the fact that playing risky sports require a lot of time and effort for a beginner to make sure that, there will not have any unwanted accidents prior to and after accomplishing trainings. One case in this point is learning how to master in go hunting. Unless a learner knows about the signals that a tiger is coming near to him, as a consequence, the occurrence of his death is predictable. It can become a cause of an unsafe environment for players.
On the opposite mark of view that encouraging community to try on new outdoor activities , it is evidently to state that having an unforgettable moment with an uncommon sport can enhance the recognition of that person. The tendency of athletes is going out of their safety zones in order to their records. Stating the status by trying the challenges in challenges is an ideal selection for who are not afraid of taking in challenged routes. For a prime illustration of this is that people on the Internet will have a high concentration on a player who joins a trip of ice hiking than the one who is only a player of a volleyball team. As a result, these athletes can receive a huge amount of benefits from the community. In my point of view, I would rather choose the option of allowing people free to choose any pastime exercise, within the condition that they are experienced to try on new things.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-08 | mintcandy8 | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | Tuan Harry | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | Tuan Harry | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
- The government should sometimes infringe on people s freedom for the security of society To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think that newspaper are the best way to learn news However others believe that they can learn news better than through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 58
- Governments should ban dangerous sports Others think that people should have the freedom to do any sport activity Discuss both sides and give your opinion 56
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news. However, others believe that they can learn news better than through other media. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 366, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: creating
...ts. On the other hand, others encourage to create more opportunities for athletes in any ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...mmunity to try on new outdoor activities , it is evidently to state that having an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69421487603 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81012668384 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564738292011 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5081705007 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.6 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73333333333 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131295916781 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379931149539 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413790220154 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887349733919 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424304358641 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.