Governments should ban dangerous sports. Others think that people should have the freedom to do any sport activity.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
The arguments over whether extreme sports should be prohibited by governments have become prevalent in recent years. While some assert that governments need to prevent people from playing those sports owing to potential risks, I am of the opinion that players should opt for sports based on their preferences.
On the one hand, it is of paramount importance for governments to impose a law against sports with potential risks. The probation of these sports activities will protect participants from being injured themselves, which, in turn, safeguards their lives. For instance, when sports lovers immerse themselves in car racing, they have to accept the fact that a car crash might happen unanticipatedly. Should a car crash occur to participants, the consequences might be adverse that could pose a significant threat to the survival of those racing in a car competition. Therefore, it is governments’ duty to enact some strict regulations hindering people from joining these dangerous sport activities.
On the other hand, others agree that opting for a sports activity based on personal interests will bring about a plethora of long-term benefits to sports participants. One of the most plausible advantages is the formation of a habit to keep playing sports daily, which will help people to stay fit in the long run. For example, when people go swimming as a hobby, they will allocate a great deal of time to swimming on a regular basis. As a result, they will bulk up gradually and might steer clear of catching a cold. Another strong point is to avoid a sedentary lifestyle. This is because whenever people bury themselves in a sports activity due to their personal preferences, the sport will keep players occupied during their free time and therefore prevent them from being lazy.
In conclusion, the debate over the probation of extreme sports has drawn a great deal of public attention. While some contend that those sports activities should be banned because of their fatality, I agree that people need to choose a sport that they prefer due to its significant benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-08 | mintcandy8 | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | Tuan Harry | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | Tuan Harry | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
- Nowadays environmental problems are too big for individual countries or people to solve We have reached the stage where we need cooperation on an international level to protect the environment To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion 84
- Governments should ban dangerous sports Others think that people should have the freedom to do any sport activity Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- In many countries the level of crime is increasing What do you think are the main causes of crime What can we deal with those causes 87
- The research indicates that nowadays some consumers are less influenced by advertising than in the past What are the reasons and is it a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...er hand, others agree that opting for a sports activity based on personal interests wi...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 628, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...se whenever people bury themselves in a sports activity due to their personal preferen...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11403508772 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82542242274 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9247069147 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.6 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299917474621 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103103284957 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721381802338 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209135085096 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472980936856 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.