The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.
The issue of the aim of science has been brought into focus recently. Whether the most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. From my perspective, I think that improving the lives of people is one of the important aims of science but it is not the most important.
It is true that promoting life is the important target of science. This is because science can advance different kinds of technological development, which improves people’s life span, therefore enhancing our livelihood. For example, many scientists focus on artificial intelligence algorithm that seek the best method to predict the incidence of disease, which allows us to prevent some terrible diseases such as cancer through changing our lifestyle. Thus, this can reduce the probability of disease.
However, improving people’s lives not the most important aim of science. It need to depend on the types of science. Improving human-being life is the aim of social science, which it is not the object of natural science. Searching for the truth and advancing knowledge are both the aim of natural science which promote the development of people. To be more specific, natural science pay close attention to the regulations about material, energy and motivation. This rules allows us to explore some terra incognita, thus contributing to seek the truth and promote other discipline development.
In conclusion, improving human life is the important aim of science but looking for the truth about our world is also another important goal of science. Therefore, I firmly believe that modifying people’s lives just one of the aim of science.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 67
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- In some cities governments have tried to reduce traffic congestion For instance they have imposed a congestion tax during rush hour Do you think this development is positive or negative 56
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- Today there are more images of disasters and violence in the media What are the cause and what are your solutions 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e has been brought into focus recently. Whether the most important aim of science shoul...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 472, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'allow'.
Suggestion: allow
...rial, energy and motivation. This rules allows us to explore some terra incognita, thu...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25095057034 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87437382669 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520912547529 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7621886712 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228204514929 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942170147579 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821232345172 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160927374703 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724941142441 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.