The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009. The second graph shows the percentage of trains running on time.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The first line graph illustrates how many passengers using train between 2000 and 2009.The second line graph demonstrates the proportion of trains running on time in comparison of standard lines, target.
Overall, there was an increase in the figure of train commuters in the period of 10 years and it reached a peak in 2005. Similarly, more trains ran on time in the same period despite a drop in 2006.
When it came to the data of people using train in 2000, there were 35 million people, after which it rose to nearly 42 million people in the next 2 years. In the following year, it witnessed a decline by 5 million people, before reached a peak to approximately 47%, ending the period by a slight drop to 42%.
As for the percentage of the punctuality of train compared with the standard lines, the share of punctual trains consistently remained at 95% in the entire period. While the proportion for standard lines started at 92%, then hitting a high off at 96% in 2005.In the next year, it reached a low of 92% which was the same as that of in 2000, before ending the period with a remarkable growth to 97%.
- All children should be made to wear school uniform To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The pie charts below compare the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts GW in 2015 with the predictions for 2040 61
- Some people believe that schoolchildren should do their class work individually Other people believe that sometimes class works should be done in small groups 73
- Some people believe the aims of university education is to help graduates get better jobs. Others believe are much wider benefit of university education for both individuals and society. 56
- The pie charts indicate changes in the proportions of energy produced in a country from 1983 to 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ngers using train between 2000 and 2009.The second line graph demonstrates the prop...
^^^
Line 6, column 260, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... then hitting a high off at 96% in 2005.In the next year, it reached a low of 92% ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, similarly, so, then, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55445544554 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5314800679 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539603960396 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.3885373206 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.428571429 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8571428571 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20054180313 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095747800154 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10717480921 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136865685946 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12066420411 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.