Nowadays, not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries. What are the reasons for this problem? What are the effects on society?
In a fast-changing world, several perspectives imply that there is a lack of university students who have a passion about science subjects. In this essay below, I will elucidate the reason behind this phenomenon and its impact on society.
There is a main reason that can specify for this situation. This is because the young individuals who are serving in scientific fields might struggle to make a living. Indeed, academic science activities require numerous efforts, consistences, time, and money to research and find out innovative and creative inventions for humanity. Instead, these durations and budgets can invest such considerable subjects which can apply to earn money when they still study in the university, meanwhile investing in researching and studying science that might not bring many monetary benefits for them in short-term periods. Therefore, students have a tendency to choose such financial and social subjects to monetize faster and cater to their living in the future.
However, this situation also poses a potential negative influence into the society and community. The young generations always have creative ideas and innovations in scientific fields that contribute to the development of humanity. There are several science-technological ideas such as 5G wireless internet, AI, chat GPT, and non-driver cars, for example, be provided by young talents who make contributions to this contemporary era. Without these, people might have several troubles related to connection, flexibility, and wasting time. For instance, without an internet connection, people cannot compromise their partnerships of their company and also have to spend much time visiting them to negotiate rather than utilizing it for more crucial activities such as investing in stocks or enlarging the market shares.
In conclusion, because of material needs related to money, students tend to choose economic and social majors rather than science which can have a hidden impact into the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-21 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-05 | thaokim2003 | 84 | view |
| 2023-12-03 | abid1 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-18 | RkmsU | 73 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree You should write at lea 89
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about current events However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both these views and give your opinion 78
- Some children spend hours everyday on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive and negative development 73
- Many adults nowadays prefer spending their free time playing computer games Why do they do this Is this a positive or negative development 73
- Young people are often influenced in their behaviors by others in the same age group Some argue that peer pressure is important while others feel it has distinct disadvantages Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 42, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs related" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'relating' or 'to be related'.
Suggestion: relating; to be related
...n conclusion, because of material needs related to money, students tend to choose econo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5625 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97878688602 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595394736842 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8607976895 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.076923077 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191428538542 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690246034854 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415049912638 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118157001871 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402764608091 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.