In business, education, and government, it is always appropriate to remain skeptical of new leaders until those leaders show that they are worthy of trust.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
It is not uncommon for people to argue that citizens should be skeptical about new leaders until they do something beneficial for people to indicate they are worthy of trust. As some politicians will disguise to be merciful before they become the leader, and turn to manipulate their power to satisfy their own interest. For this reason, I support the statement.
However some people believe that if citizens do not trust their leader, disobeying what they advocate, the society will in disorder. As different people have different view towards the regulation made by the new leader, the efficiency of the law is badly decreased. But if the leader makes a immature propose which is harmful in people's well-being? As it is widely accepted that new leaders have less experience than the older ones, so when faced a complex situation, they may make incorrect decision. In order to prevent such consequence, people should maintain doubt on them.
Moreover, if people trust their leader extremely without any doubt, even with superior admiration, it may lead to some consequence. For example, the citizens in ancient China worship their emperor so blindly that if people say something bad or just a tiny suggestion on the emperor, they may lose their lives. Also, too much trust to the new leader may contribute to corruption, as whatever the leader do, the people will believe in them. So if the leader want money, the people will give money to them without hesitation.
There are some benefit for people to remain skeptical of new leaders until they shoulder the responsibility. For the leaders, it is a direct way for them to learn from different people as well as know the drawbacks. Also, it will enhance the endurance and patience of the new leader, as there must be many disgusting words, let alone the opponents. A third advantage for the leaders is that they would be pushed to make great contribution under such pressure. Only in this way can the leader gradually become the appropriate leader. For the citizens, it is better to prevent corruption and individual admiration, which will be beneficial for the whole society.
In a word, to be skeptical of a new leader is either beneficial for the leaders but also for the society. Although trusting them can encourage them, the setbacks and hurting words is the best way to make people become strong enough to live up to people's anticipation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-13 | guozhishan | 54 | view |
| 2023-10-13 | graceeehgq | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 50 | view |
- Claim People who say they are bored should look inward rather than blaming the circumstances in which they find themselves Reason Boredom arises from a lack of imagination and self motivation Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you a 50
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your positi 50
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 70
- In any field business politics education government those in power should be required to step down after five years Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and suppo 50
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should co 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...his reason, I support the statement. However some people believe that if citizens do...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...adly decreased. But if the leader makes a immature propose which is harmful in pe...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, third, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2006.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95308641975 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66278409628 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496296296296 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7653203638 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.3 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204317836798 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812638723907 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600680115079 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136748079993 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251383353226 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.