In any field-business, politics, education, government-those in power should be required to step down after five years.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
It is not uncommon for people to argue that it is better for the leader to step down after 5 years. Proponent of the statement is that it will stimulate more people to be the leader and make contribution. However, it will also impair the effectiveness of a long-time policy as new authority would change another regulation even it is reverse to the previous one. In fact, I approve of the idea for officers to step down after 5 years.
Some will argue that the changing the authority frequently may do harm to the effectiveness of a law passed by the authority. For example, as for some project which needs humorous people and time, such as constructing a railway in order to narrow the distance from the north and south places, the project must takes over 5 years to finish the job. If the leader who proposes this project steps down after 5 years, while the new leader stops it because he or she thinks it is a waste of money. In a consequence, this project will be relinquished, with the effort to build the railway wasting in the end. However, the problem that the new authority may be against with the old one is a instinct issue which cannot be solve as long as changing the new authority.
Although change of the authority may lead to the problem for the new one inconsistent with the previous one, a leader persistently in authority may lead to some problems. For one thing, 5 years is such an enough time for people to observe whether the leader is responsible and competitive to manage a state. If the leader is corrosive to the society, with all of the new laws and regulations fail to the anticipation of citizens. After 5 years, the leader will be replaced by a new one. Another reason is that when leader remains a long time in authority, the younger with revolutionary idea cannot have the political power. In that case, there are full of conventional and old policies in the party without any innovation.
Moreover, the longer time a people in authority, the more he will be entrenched in the party which will probably be the basis of corruption. To image a new leader at the beginning. For the first time, he becomes a leader of a country, he wants to do the best in everything in order to flourish the country. However, as time flying, he becomes familiar with the people in the party and gets bored to do everything by himself. At this time, he will let others who he trusts to do, and accepts the money from the mongers in big company. As he is in authority for a long time, no one dares to criticize him. Such a situation displays how a corruption emerges when a person stays for too long as a leader.
To sum up, though changing the authority may reduce the effectiveness, it cannot be avoided. I agree that the leader should step down.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-16 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | jenas | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-28 | Mirza Raquib | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | swetha_14r | 50 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | userxyz110 | 58 | view |
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species despite the expense to humans in effort time and financial well being Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money an 66
- The best way to teach whether as an educator employer or parent is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your positio 50
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should co 50
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posit 66
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 682, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rity may be against with the old one is a instinct issue which cannot be solve as...
^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...eader is corrosive to the society, with all of the new laws and regulations fail to the an...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, as for, for example, in fact, such as, for one thing, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2262.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 503.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49701789264 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66390611328 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.419483101392 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 724.5 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.194638776 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.25 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9583333333 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12402255452 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464586789652 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420917796995 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0884471189511 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287747491202 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 12.1639044944 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.