Friendships that take place online are not as meaningful as those where people meet each other face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Online camaraderies are not assumed to be as valuable as physical friendships. I am not strongly convinced of this perspective because I reckon friendships can be established no matter the location. In this essay, I will analyze above perspective as well as elaborate my point of view.
The connection between people can be linked through online networking no matter different location. Individuals can interact with both domestic and international friends on social media to exchange information for the first time. Subsequently, they might easily find coincidental perspectives, from that, their friendships can gradually build. A plethora of individuals living in other regions such as America and Australia, for example, have numerous Asian best friends due to online communication even though they never encounter real-life situations.
On the other hand, friendships can be maintained thanks to face-to-face connections. People might match with others based on various factors such as similar career disciplines, local habits, eligible gestures, and first great impressions. They can easily make a decision whether they are approachable to be best friends or not due to these factors. For instance, several people who specialize in finance can make friends in this field through several local direct conferences or webinars.
To sum up, close-knit camaraderies can be established no matter what it is online or offline. Therefore, I am not preferable the perspective that online friendships can not be as meaningful as physical connections.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-22 | thaokim2003 | 61 | view |
| 2024-05-22 | thaokim2003 | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2024-05-16 | Mollymaul | 61 | view |
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glomour and weath than for their achievemnets and this sets a bad example to young people To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 89
- Nowadays not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries What are the reasons for this problem What are the effects on society 84
- Some people fail in school but end up being successful in life why do you think that is the case What is the most important thing to succeed 84
- The advantages brought by the spread of english as a global language will continue to outweight the disadvantages Do you agree or disagree 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i reckon, such as, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 234.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62393162393 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22400141317 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594017094017 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9051932626 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.230769231 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132151352408 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054499043952 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609117794058 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0843033929904 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349367983037 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i reckon, such as, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 234.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62393162393 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22400141317 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594017094017 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9051932626 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.230769231 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132151352408 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054499043952 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609117794058 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0843033929904 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349367983037 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.