Friendships that take place online are not as meaningful as those where people meet each other face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today’s interconnected world, there is ongoing debate about the significance of online friendships compared to those formed through face-to-face interactions. Online camaraderies are often assumed less valuable than in-person ones. I am not strongly convinced of this perspective because I reckon friendships can be established no matter the location. In this essay, I will analyze above perspective as well as elaborate my point of view.
The connection between people can be linked through online networking no matter geographical boundaries and physical limitations. Individuals can interact with friends domestically and internationally on social media to exchange information. This leads to gradual friendships due to the coincidental perspectives and genuine connections formed online. A plethora of individuals living in other regions such as America and Australia, for example, have numerous Asian best friends due to online communication even though they never encounter real-life situations.
Alternatively, face-to-face interactions also play an important role in maintaining friendships. People can bond with others based on various factors such as similar career disciplines, local customs, compatible personalities, and first great impressions. They can easily make a decision whether they are approachable to be best friends or not due to these in-depth and authentic in-person factors. For instance, several people who specialize in finance can make friends in this field through several local direct conferences or webinars.
To sum up, close-knit camaraderies can be established no regardless it is online or offline. Therefore, I am not preferable the perspective that online friendships are less meaningful than physical connections.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-22 | thaokim2003 | 61 | view |
| 2024-05-22 | thaokim2003 | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2024-05-16 | Mollymaul | 61 | view |
- Discuss the issues surrounding the lack of funding for schools in low income areas What solutions can be proposed to address this 89
- Some people say that young people should be encouraged to leave home when they become adults while others claim it is better if they remain with their family Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solutions can you suggest 78
- The rise of social media platforms has made it easier for people to vent their frustrations and complaints publicly What is the consequence of this trend Is there any benefit to expressing complaints on social media 67
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about current events However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both these views and give your opinion 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i reckon, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.99206349206 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42246664027 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634920634921 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.741318105 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.857142857 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163285537503 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566888650462 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597908989148 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10195422286 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029101972949 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.17 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i reckon, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.99206349206 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42246664027 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634920634921 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.741318105 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.857142857 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163285537503 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566888650462 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597908989148 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10195422286 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029101972949 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.17 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.