Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about the news. However, others believe that they can learn the news more effectively through other media.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is ongoing debate about the optimal medium of staying updated with current events. While some contend that newspapers are the most effective, others argue that alternative forms of media offer superior efficacy. Although both viewpoints hold distinct merits, I lean more towards the latter for the following reasons.
On the one hand, one compelling reason for the perspective that traditional publications are the most effective in news dissemination is credibility. The conventional press often has stringent editorial standards to ensure reliability and credibility, hindering readers from accessing misleading information that can distort their understanding of the event. Those fact-checking standards, as a result, can emerge as a reliable source of reference for numerous research papers. For instance, many researchers have utilized the information released by New Scientist to publish their findings about the severity of global warming on the environment and other alarming issues, reflecting the reliability and credibility of traditional newspapers.
On the other hand, others contend that digital platforms are more effective in news updates due to their instant capabilities and the incorporation of multimedia elements. The prevalence of portable gadgets, such as smartphones and smartwatches, has entitled readers to access instantaneous breaking news, prompting readers to stay informed of current movements in society. These timely news updates can help individuals respond appropriately to any unanticipated problems, safeguarding their lives. Additionally, the incorporation of visual aids, including infographics, audio and videos, has enhanced readers’ comprehension of current changes. For example, thanks to captivating visual elements, news updates on the devastating destructions of Super Typhoon Yagi in northern Vietnam have become more comprehensible and moving to many individuals.
In conclusion, despite having some arguments as to which medium is more effective in the dissemination of current events, I argue that alternative forms of media offer a higher level of efficacy. The instant capabilities and multimedia elements of social platforms have brought about timely and exhaustive outlooks to readers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-12 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2024-09-11 | Tuan Harry | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-24 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
- Governments should ban dangerous sports Others think that people should have the freedom to do any sport activity Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- All large companies should provide sports and community facilities to the local community To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- The graph below gives information about computer possession by households in one European country between 1997 and 2011 67
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen Is it positive or negative development 78
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...h both viewpoints hold distinct merits, I lean more towards the latter for the fo...
^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...in the dissemination of current events, I argue that alternative forms of media o...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1939.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.059375 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27343563544 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5373644664 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.5 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187976947274 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616476014263 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489375073175 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109010091419 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298620897964 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.16 12.4159519038 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.04 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.