Nowadays, eating habits of people around the world are changing, causing them many health problems including obesity. Why do people tend to eat so badly? What can be done to improve their eating habits?
Recent years have witnessed dramatic changes in the way global citizens consume food and drinks, triggering numerous critical health issues, including overweight. This essay will examine the underlying reasons for this detrimental shift and propose solutions to improve eating habits.
Anti-social working hours and commercial pops-up of fast food have negatively influenced the eating habits of global citizens. To illustrate, the fact that working adults have to work enduring working hours at night has forced them to have meals later than the usual time. The changes in mealtime demand the intestinal system to work unproperly, resulting in severe stomachache and other health issues. Additionally, commercial advertisements of ready-made food items on television and social networking sites have contributed to changes in eating habits. For instance, fried chicken made by KFC has significantly fostered a habit of fast food intake among children. The frequent intake of fast food containing a high volume of calories can induce obesity, high blood pressure and other health issues.
Nevertheless, governments and companies can collaborate positively to transform how people eat daily. Firstly, governments can impose stricter laws against eye-catching advertisements of ready-made products. This can be done by asking manufacturers to add terrifying images of obesity and cancer on the packages of food items. Should people get traumatized by the consequences of fast food consumption, they may avoid consuming ready-made products and maintain healthy eating habits. Additionally, companies should provide employees with adequate breaks during working hours so that they can have their meals on time. This policy may provide them with precious opportunities to enjoy food gradually, minimizing stomachache and other intestinal issues.
In conclusion, there are numerous factors resulting in the formation of bad eating habits; however, anti-social working hours and eye-catching advertisements of junk food are the chief ones. Nevertheless, governmental intervention and companies’ policies can be a key to better nurturing healthy eating habits globally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-07 | Tuan Harry | 78 | view |
- Employers should give their staff at least a 4 week holiday a year to help employees perform better in their jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- The increase in the number of privately owned cars is having a negative impact on both our towns and the environment What can individuals and the government do to reduce this problem 44
- The chart below gives information about the UK s ageing population in 1985 and makes predictions for 2035 100
- In many countries the proportion of older people is steadily increasing Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society 78
- Nowadays eating habits of people around the world are changing causing them many health problems including obesity Why do people tend to eat so badly What can be done to improve their eating habits 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, as for, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.92038216561 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08202107535 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573248407643 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.2021078673 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.1875 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228225788218 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077348340281 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480026879183 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142969592606 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316803061374 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, as for, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.92038216561 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08202107535 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573248407643 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.2021078673 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.1875 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228225788218 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077348340281 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480026879183 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142969592606 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316803061374 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.