Letter of recommendation
As technology lead, at Infosys Limited, I take this opportunity to pen down this recommendation letter for Mr. Dhaval Bhojavani. I am happy with his decision to pursue higher studies as it will provide him the cutting edge knowledge which will surely help him to take his current learning in programming and networking to next level.
He has worked in many pioneering projects during his period in Infosys. A standout among most projects was his first SDN & NFV project for telecom client, Verizon. The objective of project was to automate the configuration provisioning and monitoring of riverbed virtual network function with help of open source product MANO (Management & Network Orchestration). Considering, the first project in this new evolving technology after finishing the basic training of SDN & NFV, I was most impressed with Dhaval’ s zeal to embrace this technology at such an early phase. Also, on display was his team-spirit where he ensured to walk the extra mile of assisting his team members where needed.
Along with his great learning ability, his curiosity to learn new technology makes him standout among the crowd. He asked questions on the open source forum and cleared the various doubts of team. He has presented tremendous efforts to learn and delivered the project on very strict timelines. The hard work and dedication of entire team has finally paid off after attracting various service provider clients for the organization in SDN/NFV domain.
Dhaval has great potential on the field of networking and software program. However, I certainly believe there is more to him and his complete potential is yet to be fully tapped. He now requires a specialized research based master’s program which will enhance his grasp over latest technologies and tools. I assure you he will continue to valuably contribute within research and development. Therefore, I strongly recommend his admission at your esteemed university.
Please contact me, if you need any further details on his recommendation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-16 | Nguyen Quoc Cuong | 22 | view |
| 2018-12-05 | Dhaval2693 | 11 | view |
| 2018-11-17 | Dhaval2693 | 11 | view |
- In Megalopolis the number of law school graduates who went to work for large corporate firms declined by 15 percent over the last three years whereas an increasing number of graduates took jobs at small general practice firms Even though large firms usual 77
- People learn things better from those at their own level - such as fellow students or coworkers - than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors. 73
- The purpose of many advertisements is to make consumers want to buy a product so that they will 'be like' the person in the ad. This practice is effective because it not only sells products but also helps people feel better about themselves. 50
- As a vibrant community of learners dedicated to inclusive excellence, the students, faculty and staff at the University of Colorado Boulder seek to be open and respectful of contrasting beliefs and opinions. Every student has a unique life experience and 16
- Given that the number of people in our country with some form of arthritis is expected to rise from 40 million to 60 million over the next twenty years, pharmaceutical companies that produce drugs for the treatment of arthritis should be very profitable. 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, so, therefore, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30124223602 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93836649061 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621118012422 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4474105756 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.411764706 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52941176471 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0596836415567 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0222657501006 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631454700487 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0373958241329 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538261622382 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 0.67 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.