Any recent inventions that you think proved beneficial or detrimental to society?

Essay topics:

Any recent inventions that you think proved beneficial or detrimental to society?

The technology always impresses us by its numerous inventions for the society which have merits on our daily life which can not be ignored but also have de-merits affect on
human life which can not be justified. This essay will explain the myriad advantages and disadvantages on new inventions to our society.

The conspicuous invention comes to our mind is a smartphone, "invented by scientist" which is now major part of human life for various activities. For example application on smartphone help
us to book a cab for daily travel to office, banking transection for money transfer and Google map for navigation shows a melodious effect on human life which can not
be ignored. This inventions of smartphone become beneficial to mankind which transforms the human life to next phase and made easier the human lives.

On the flip side, The smartphones create a virtual world for human society which adversely impacting the relationship among mankind, For example, Facebook and Youtube create a virtual world of social media
of its users which relatively made users addicted. This resulting people start marginalizing own priority and become lazy and lethargic. This addiction
is detrimental to society.

Overall new inventions made peoples life easier but sometimes create adversely impact on human life which has to be addressed by human only.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-29 maninder1989 61 view
2019-08-08 heams87 55 view
2019-07-25 Navneet dhillon 77 view
2019-07-25 Akashdeepsingh 77 view
2019-07-25 Vanshdeep singh 11 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... not be ignored but also have de-merits affect on human life which can not be justified....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 13, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...n human life which can not be ignored. This inventions of smartphone become benefic...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, as to, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 217.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33640552995 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92061939085 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 139.433497537 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543778801843 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 379.143842365 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3533377616 50.4703680194 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.666666667 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 7.25397266985 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.12807881773 218% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0776815274239 0.242375264174 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431851722403 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309440136672 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0482269427922 0.151781067708 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414824705293 0.0609392437508 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.